Oukitel WP52 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Detailed Rugged Smartphone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and battery endurance, the Oukitel WP52 emerges as the clear winner. Its Dimensity 6100+ chipset delivers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, coupled with impressive 65:13h battery life. However, the Cat S62 Pro benefits from Cat's established reputation in the rugged phone space.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP52 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 17 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80 x 12 mm (6.78 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 281 g (9.91 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 440 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Blue | Black |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:13h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP52
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 6100+
- Exceptional battery life (65:13h endurance)
- Potentially more modern display technology
- Less established brand reputation
- Charging speed is relatively standard (18W)
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand with a history in rugged phones
- Potentially better software support (depending on Cat's update policy)
- Familiar Qualcomm chipset
- Older and less powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Less efficient 14nm process
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP52's newer chipset, it's reasonable to expect a more modern panel with potentially higher brightness and color accuracy. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility should investigate independent display tests for both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature capable, but not flagship-level, camera systems. The WP52's newer chipset may offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better image quality in challenging lighting conditions. Users should focus on real-world photo and video samples to assess the actual performance of each device's camera.
Performance
The Oukitel WP52's Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Cat S62 Pro's Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and transistor density, translating to improved performance and reduced heat generation. The Dimensity 6100+'s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is expected to outperform the Snapdragon 660's (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the WP52.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP52 boasts a remarkable 65:13h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Cat S62 Pro's battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 660's less efficient 14nm process likely results in shorter runtimes. The WP52's 18W wired charging is standard for this class, but the superior battery endurance minimizes the need for frequent charging. The WP52's stated 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP52 if you need a rugged phone with strong processing power for multitasking, demanding apps, or light gaming, and prioritize long battery life for extended field work. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you value a well-known brand with a proven track record in rugged devices, and your usage is primarily focused on basic communication and less intensive tasks. The S62 Pro is a safer bet for those unfamiliar with Oukitel.