Oukitel WP39 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and performance, the Oukitel WP39 emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660, coupled with an astonishing 109:23h endurance. While the Cat S62 Pro has a reputation for ruggedness, the WP39 provides a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP39 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 17 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Black |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 109:23h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP39
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 6100+)
- Exceptional battery endurance (109:23h)
- Modern chipset with improved power efficiency
- Charging speed is relatively standard (18W)
- Display specifications are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Proven durability and reliability
- Potentially more readily available accessories
- Older and less powerful processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Likely lower battery endurance
- May lack modern features and software updates
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's age (released 2019), it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Oukitel WP39, being a newer device, may benefit from advancements in display technology, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so expect both to have practical, rather than stunning, screens.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the age of the Cat S62 Pro suggests its camera system is likely less advanced than what’s achievable with current technology. Modern chipsets like the Dimensity 6100+ also offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better image quality on the Oukitel WP39, even with similar sensor sizes. The presence of a dedicated ISP on the Dimensity 6100+ will likely result in better noise reduction and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP39’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) represents a substantial architectural upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better performance and reduced heat generation. The Dimensity 6100+’s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is expected to outperform the Snapdragon 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the WP39.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP39’s battery endurance of 109:23h is a standout feature. While the capacity isn't specified, this endurance figure suggests a large battery combined with the power efficiency of the Dimensity 6100+ chipset. The 18W wired charging is relatively standard, but the exceptional endurance minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Cat S62 Pro’s battery performance is not provided, but given its older chipset and larger process node, it’s unlikely to match the WP39’s longevity. The 1100 charge cycles claim for the WP39 also indicates a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP39 if you need a rugged phone that can handle demanding tasks, extended use between charges, and offers a more modern processor for smoother multitasking and gaming. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a brand with a long-standing reputation in the rugged phone market and are comfortable with a slightly older, less powerful chipset in exchange for a known quantity.