Oukitel WP39 Pro vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Oukitel WP39 Pro emerges as the winner. Its impressive 109:23h battery endurance and modern Dimensity 6300 chipset offer a compelling package. While the Cat S75 boasts a more powerful Dimensity 930, the WP39 Pro’s battery life and charging capabilities provide a more practical advantage for outdoor enthusiasts and demanding professionals.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP39 Pro | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 11 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.2 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, portrait, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), AF 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 187 min Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Grey, Green | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | - | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 109:23h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP39 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (109:23h endurance)
- Modern Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- 1100 battery charge cycles for longevity
- Potentially less powerful CPU than the Cat S75
- No wireless charging
Cat S75
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Premium build quality (likely)
- Significantly shorter battery life (estimated)
- Slower charging speeds compared to WP39 Pro
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged focus, both likely employ durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Cat S75, positioned slightly higher in the market, *may* feature a marginally higher peak brightness for outdoor visibility, but this is speculative. The absence of LTPO technology on either suggests standard refresh rates, prioritizing power efficiency over fluid visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Cat S75 likely features a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and scene detection, the Cat S75’s higher price point implies a larger sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Oukitel WP39 Pro may compensate with software enhancements, but the Dimensity 930’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Cat S75 offers greater potential for image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930, featuring Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clear performance advantage over the Oukitel WP39 Pro’s Dimensity 6300 (Cortex-A76). The A78 cores are architecturally superior, translating to faster single-core performance and improved responsiveness in demanding tasks. However, both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, suggesting comparable efficiency. The WP39 Pro’s newer chipset *may* benefit from incremental improvements in power management, but the Cat S75’s raw processing power will be noticeable in gaming and video editing. The WP39 Pro's 1100 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term usability, mitigating potential performance degradation over time.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP39 Pro’s battery endurance of 109:23h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically expected from a smartphone. This is coupled with 33W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 187 minutes. The Cat S75, lacking wired charging speed data, compensates with 15W wireless charging. While convenient, wireless charging is significantly slower. The WP39 Pro’s reverse wired charging capability adds further versatility, allowing it to charge other devices. The sheer longevity of the WP39 Pro’s battery makes it the clear winner for users prioritizing extended usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP39 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you value a modern chipset at a competitive price. It’s ideal for extended trips, fieldwork, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Cat S75 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications and prefer the convenience of wireless charging, even at the expense of battery endurance. It’s better suited for users who frequently use resource-intensive apps or games.