Oukitel WP36 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel WP36 is the clear winner. Its 101:19h endurance significantly outpaces what the Cat S62 Pro can offer. However, those needing smoother application performance and a more established brand reputation will find the Cat S62 Pro a worthwhile investment.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP36 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 06 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80.7 x 19.1 mm (6.78 x 3.18 x 0.75 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 393.7 g (13.90 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~73.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF 2 MP (macro) | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (128 dB, 3.5W peak) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, | Black |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 101:19h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP36
- Exceptional battery life (101:19h endurance)
- High charge cycle rating (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Older chipset (Mediatek MT8788)
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Potentially lower build quality
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 660)
- Established brand reputation (Cat)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price point
- Slower charging compared to modern standards
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing for the WP36, but given its price point, we can expect a standard IPS LCD panel. The Cat S62 Pro also utilizes an IPS LCD. The key difference will likely be in color calibration and brightness, with Cat historically focusing on outdoor visibility. Without specific nit ratings for the WP36, it's difficult to assess, but the S62 Pro’s panel is likely optimized for use in direct sunlight, a crucial feature for a rugged device.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent for the Oukitel WP36, making a direct comparison challenging. However, rugged phones often prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The Cat S62 Pro’s camera system, while not flagship-level, benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP). This ISP provides better noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the likely ISP found in the WP36. The focus should be on reliable image capture in challenging conditions, rather than artistic quality. Both devices likely feature basic camera functionality suitable for documentation and quick snapshots.
Performance
The chipset choice defines the performance disparity. The Oukitel WP36’s Mediatek MT8788 (12nm) utilizes a big.LITTLE architecture with Cortex-A73 and A53 cores. While capable, it’s a generation behind the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) found in the Cat S62 Pro. The Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores, particularly the Gold cores, offer a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and multitasking. The 14nm process node, while larger than the WP36’s 12nm, is a mature process known for stability. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience on the Cat S62 Pro, especially for users running multiple apps or playing graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Oukitel WP36 truly shines. Its claimed 101:19h endurance is exceptional, suggesting a massive battery capacity paired with efficient power management. The 15W charging is relatively slow, but the 1000 charge cycle rating indicates long-term battery health. The Cat S62 Pro, while offering respectable battery life, cannot compete with the WP36’s longevity. The lack of detailed battery capacity information for the S62 Pro makes a precise comparison difficult, but the WP36’s endurance is a significant advantage for users who need a phone that can last for days without needing a recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP36 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, are working in remote locations with limited access to power, or require a highly affordable rugged option. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a more polished user experience, rely on applications that benefit from Qualcomm’s optimized chipset, and value a brand known for its enterprise-grade rugged devices.