Oukitel WP36 Pro vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Rugged Showdown of Power and Stamina
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset offers a significant upgrade over the Oukitel WP36 Pro’s MT8788, and the 66W charging drastically reduces downtime. However, those needing maximum uptime will still find the WP36 Pro’s endurance compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP36 Pro | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 08 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80.7 x 19.1 mm (6.78 x 3.18 x 0.75 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 393.7 g (13.90 oz) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~73.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (128 dB, 3.5W peak) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 101:19h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP36 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (101:19h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slow 15W wired charging
- Older, less powerful MT8788 chipset
- Potentially less efficient display technology
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Significantly faster 66W wired charging
- More powerful and efficient Helio G99 chipset
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to WP36 Pro
- Battery cycle count not specified
- May be more expensive than the WP36 Pro
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 17 Pro's focus on modern features, it likely benefits from a higher refresh rate panel than the WP36 Pro. The WP36 Pro, being an older model, may utilize a less efficient LCD panel, impacting overall battery consumption. Color accuracy and peak brightness are unknown, but the Armor 17 Pro's newer chipset could support more advanced display processing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the Armor 17 Pro’s newer chipset likely includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The WP36 Pro’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual use, but the Armor 17 Pro is expected to offer a more refined photographic experience. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Armor 17 Pro, if equipped, would further enhance image clarity and stability.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a substantial leap forward compared to the Oukitel WP36 Pro’s Mediatek MT8788 (12nm). The G99’s newer architecture – featuring 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores versus the MT8788’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 – translates to significantly improved CPU and GPU performance. The 6nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Armor 17 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP36 Pro boasts impressive endurance, rated at 101:19h, and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan. However, its 15W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro, while potentially having a smaller battery capacity (not specified), compensates with 66W wired charging, achieving 53% charge in just 15 minutes. It also offers 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, adding convenience. The Armor 17 Pro’s more efficient chipset also contributes to better battery management, potentially mitigating the impact of a smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP36 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. It's ideal for fieldwork, extended travel, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and everyday use, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means charging more frequently.