Oukitel WP36 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and less frequent charging, the Oukitel WP36 Pro is the clear winner. Its 101:19h endurance significantly outpaces what the Cat S62 Pro can offer. However, the S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 provides a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP36 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 08 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80.7 x 19.1 mm (6.78 x 3.18 x 0.75 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 393.7 g (13.90 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~73.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF 2 MP (macro) | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (128 dB, 3.5W peak) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 101:19h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP36 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (101:19h endurance)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower 15W charging
- Less efficient chipset (Mediatek MT8788)
- Potentially less refined user experience
Cat S62 Pro
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 660)
- Established brand reputation in the rugged market
- Potentially smoother multitasking
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Likely higher price point
- Slower app loading compared to newer chipsets
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged focus, both likely employ durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Cat S62 Pro, benefiting from a higher price point, may offer slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Oukitel WP36 Pro's display will likely prioritize visibility in direct sunlight, a common requirement for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over cutting-edge camera technology. Both devices likely feature capable main sensors for outdoor photography, but image processing will be a key differentiator. Cat phones often tune their cameras for realistic color reproduction, while Oukitel may lean towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a definitive judgment impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP36 Pro utilizes the Mediatek MT8788, a 12nm octa-core processor. While offering decent performance with its Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, the 12nm process is less efficient than the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Snapdragon 660, with its Kryo 260 cores, is generally more responsive for multitasking and app loading. The Snapdragon’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance, potentially leading to less throttling under prolonged load, despite the larger node size. This benefits users who frequently switch between applications or engage in light gaming.
Battery Life
This is where the Oukitel WP36 Pro truly shines. Its reported 101:19h endurance is exceptional, indicating a massive battery capacity and efficient power management. The 15W charging is relatively slow compared to modern standards, but the extended battery life mitigates this. The Cat S62 Pro, while likely offering respectable battery life, cannot compete with the WP36 Pro’s longevity. The Snapdragon 660’s efficiency helps, but the difference in overall endurance is substantial. The WP36 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories in the field.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP36 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, are frequently away from power sources, or require a device for extended field work where battery anxiety is a concern. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a more established brand with a focus on professional use, value a slightly more refined user experience, and don't mind charging your phone more frequently.