Oukitel WP36 Pro vs Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and longevity, the Oukitel WP36 Pro is the clear winner, thanks to its exceptional 101:19h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles. However, the Blackview BV8800 appeals to those who value quicker top-ups with its 33W charging and a more capable processor for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP36 Pro | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 08 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 80.7 x 19.1 mm (6.78 x 3.18 x 0.75 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 393.7 g (13.90 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~73.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (128 dB, 3.5W peak) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 101:19h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP36 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (101:19h)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Rugged design for durability
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Older chipset (MT8788) limits performance
Blackview BV8800
- Faster charging (33W, 100% in 90 mins)
- More powerful chipset (Helio G96) for smoother performance
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- Lower battery endurance (199h)
- Potentially shorter battery lifespan compared to WP36 Pro
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits and a 1348:1 contrast ratio, providing a visibly brighter and more vibrant viewing experience compared to the Oukitel WP36 Pro, for which display specs are not provided. While both share the same contrast ratio, the BV8800’s higher brightness is crucial for outdoor visibility. The lack of detailed display information for the WP36 Pro suggests a more basic panel, likely prioritizing cost savings over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. However, the chipset difference suggests the BV8800 will offer superior image processing capabilities due to its more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor). The lack of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible, but the G96’s processing power gives it an edge. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is often a marketing gimmick, offering limited real-world benefit.
Performance
The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset, featuring 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, represents a significant architectural upgrade over the Oukitel WP36 Pro’s Mediatek MT8788. The G96’s Cortex-A76 cores deliver superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The MT8788, with its older Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who play mobile games or use resource-intensive apps.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP36 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional 101:19h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles, indicating a focus on long-term battery health and longevity. While the Blackview BV8800 offers a respectable 199h endurance, it falls significantly short of the WP36 Pro. The BV8800 compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes, a substantial improvement over the WP36 Pro’s 15W charging. This trade-off means the BV8800 is more convenient for quick top-ups, while the WP36 Pro excels at minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP36 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, especially in situations where access to power is limited – think camping, construction, or remote fieldwork. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a more responsive user experience with faster app loading and smoother multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster charging, even if it means slightly less overall endurance.