Oukitel WP35 vs Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potential for reverse wireless charging, the Blackview BV9300 is the better choice. However, the Oukitel WP35 offers a competitive performance profile at a potentially lower price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 13 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Caramel | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 390 EUR |
Oukitel WP35
- Potentially better GPU performance with Dimensity 6100+
- Likely more affordable price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- No reverse charging capability
- Missing display specifications
Blackview BV9300
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Convenient 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially smoother display (speculative)
- Helio G99 chipset may offer slightly lower peak performance
- Likely a higher price tag
- Missing display specifications
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency. However, display specifications are missing. Given Blackview's history with higher refresh rate panels in this price bracket, it's reasonable to assume the BV9300 *may* offer a smoother visual experience, though this is speculative. The absence of display details makes a direct comparison impossible, but users should prioritize screen brightness and outdoor visibility when making a decision.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a detailed comparison challenging. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over cutting-edge camera technology. It's likely both devices feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, it's difficult to assess image quality. Users should look for reviews focusing on real-world camera performance rather than relying solely on megapixel counts.
Performance
Both the Oukitel WP35 and Blackview BV9300 employ an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. However, the chipset differs: the WP35 uses the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+, while the BV9300 opts for the Helio G99. While CPU clock speeds are identical, the Dimensity 6100+ generally offers a more modern architecture and improved GPU performance, potentially leading to a smoother experience in graphically demanding applications. The G99 is a proven performer, but the 6100+ has a slight edge in raw processing power. The impact of RAM speed (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR5X, assumed) is also a factor, with the latter providing faster data access and improved multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Blackview BV9300 boasts 33W wired charging, significantly faster than the Oukitel WP35's 18W charging. This translates to considerably quicker top-up times, a crucial advantage for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. The BV9300 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge accessories like earbuds or smartwatches – a feature absent on the WP35. While a larger battery capacity on the WP35 could partially offset the slower charging, the convenience of the BV9300's faster charging and reverse charging capabilities is a significant benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 if you need a reliable, capable rugged phone with solid performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and aren't overly concerned with the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize quicker top-ups, the convenience of reverse wired charging for accessories, and a slightly more feature-rich experience, even if it comes at a potential price premium.