Oukitel WP35 S vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Rugged Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is the superior choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, coupled with significantly faster 66W charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. While the Oukitel WP35 S boasts impressive battery endurance, the Armor 17 Pro’s efficiency and charging speed make it the more practical option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | - |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Black |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery endurance (120:51h)
- 1000 charge cycles promise longevity
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Slower processor (Helio G85)
- Slow charging speed (18W)
- Likely less refined user experience
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster and more efficient processor (Helio G99)
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to WP35 S
- Likely higher price point
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 17 Pro's positioning, it likely features a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the WP35 S. The focus on processing power suggests Ulefone invested more in the overall user experience, which often includes a better display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, Ulefone typically focuses on camera capabilities in their 'Pro' models. It's reasonable to assume the Armor 17 Pro features a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The WP35 S likely offers a functional camera, but the Armor 17 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant leap over the Oukitel WP35 S’s Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process node is inherently more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Armor 17 Pro’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, also outperforms the WP35 S’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. While both utilize octa-core configurations, the architectural improvements in the G99 provide a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 S boasts an impressive 120:51h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. However, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro compensates for potentially a smaller battery (spec not provided) with its 66W wired charging, capable of delivering 53% charge in just 15 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The WP35 S’s 18W charging is comparatively slow. Furthermore, the Armor 17 Pro adds 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you prioritize maximum battery life above all else and operate in situations where frequent charging isn't possible. Its 120:51h endurance is a standout feature. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you value faster performance for apps and gaming, and appreciate the convenience of rapid 66W wired and 15W wireless charging. It’s the better all-rounder for users who need a responsive and quickly-rechargeable rugged device.