Oukitel WP35 S vs Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and value, the Oukitel WP35 S emerges as the winner. Its astounding 120:51h endurance significantly outpaces the XR20, making it ideal for extended outdoor use. However, the Nokia XR20’s 5G capabilities and wireless charging offer compelling advantages for those needing faster data speeds and modern convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | - |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- Cost-effective performance with the Helio G85
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging for added convenience
- Nokia’s software update commitment
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to the WP35 S
- Snapdragon 480 is less power efficient than the G85 in some scenarios
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are absent, suggesting both utilize standard LCD panels. The focus here is clearly on durability, not visual fidelity. However, the XR20’s inclusion of 15W wireless charging suggests a more modern feature set, potentially indicating a slightly more refined display experience, though this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility rather than exceptional image quality. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures suggests neither device will excel in low-light photography. It’s reasonable to assume the XR20, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processing capabilities, may offer slightly better image quality and video stabilization, but this remains unconfirmed.
Performance
The chipset choice defines the performance profiles. The Oukitel WP35 S utilizes the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), a proven performer in the budget to mid-range segment. Its octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) provides adequate power for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Conversely, the Nokia XR20 features the Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The 8nm process node offers improved power efficiency compared to the G85’s 12nm, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. Crucially, the Snapdragon 480 unlocks 5G connectivity, a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage. While both CPUs share a 2x2.0 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz core layout, the Snapdragon’s Kryo cores are architecturally more advanced, offering a slight edge in single-core performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Oukitel WP35 S truly shines. Its reported 120:51h endurance is exceptional, indicating a massive battery capacity optimized for longevity. The 18W wired charging is standard, but the sheer battery size mitigates the need for faster charging speeds. The Nokia XR20, while offering the convenience of 15W wireless charging, falls short in endurance. The lack of specific mAh figures makes a direct comparison challenging, but the XR20’s 5G connectivity and more power-efficient chipset are likely offset by a smaller battery capacity. The WP35 S is the clear winner for users prioritizing multi-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if 5G connectivity isn't a priority. It’s perfect for construction workers, hikers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves off-grid. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone with 5G support for faster download and streaming speeds, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and value Nokia’s software update policy for long-term security.