Oukitel WP35 S vs. Motorola Defy 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and a dependable, affordable rugged phone, the Oukitel WP35 S is the clear winner. However, the Motorola Defy 2’s Dimensity 930 chipset delivers substantially higher performance, making it the better choice for demanding users who value speed and responsiveness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Helio G85)
- Slower charging speed (18W wired)
Motorola Defy 2
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 930)
- Wireless charging convenience (15W)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Shorter battery life (estimated)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, but the target market suggests both will prioritize durability over cutting-edge display tech. Expect LCD panels on both. The focus is on visibility in direct sunlight and scratch resistance, not peak brightness or color accuracy. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to further protect the screen.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset difference suggests the Defy 2 will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The Oukitel WP35 S will likely focus on providing a functional camera for documentation purposes, while the Defy 2 aims for a more versatile photographic experience. We can assume both will include a standard wide and potentially an ultrawide lens, but details on sensor size and aperture are crucial for a proper assessment.
Performance
The Motorola Defy 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a significant leap in processing power compared to the Oukitel WP35 S’s Helio G85 (12nm). The Dimensity 930’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a substantial performance advantage over the G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Defy 2, particularly beneficial for users running demanding applications or mobile games. The G85 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with more intensive operations.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 S boasts an impressive 120:51h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Defy 2’s battery capacity is unknown, its more powerful Dimensity 930 chipset will consume more power. The WP35 S also supports 18W wired charging, while the Defy 2 opts for 15W wireless charging. Wireless charging offers convenience, but is generally slower than wired charging. The WP35 S’s 1000 charge cycle rating suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself, a key consideration for long-term durability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases are communication, navigation, and light media consumption in demanding environments. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prioritize smooth multitasking, gaming, and faster app loading times, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for a more powerful processor and the convenience of wireless charging.