Oukitel WP35 S vs Doogee S98 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Oukitel WP35 S emerges as the winner. Its impressive 120:51h battery endurance significantly outweighs the Doogee S98 Pro’s performance edge, especially considering the price difference likely exists. However, users demanding faster performance and wireless charging will find the S98 Pro a more compelling choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Doogee S98 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | - |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 320 g (11.29 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights Thermal imaging camera |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Black |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- Potentially lower price point
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term usability
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- No wireless charging
Doogee S98 Pro
- Faster processor (Helio G96)
- Faster wired and wireless charging (33W/15W)
- Potentially better image processing
- Shorter battery life
- Likely higher price
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Doogee S98 Pro, being positioned as a slightly more premium device, may benefit from a higher peak brightness or slightly better color calibration. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests neither phone is targeting display-centric users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Doogee S98 Pro’s more powerful processor likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The market trend for rugged phones often prioritizes megapixel count over sensor size, so it’s probable both phones feature relatively small sensors. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone excels in low-light photography without a stable hand or tripod.
Performance
The Doogee S98 Pro holds a clear advantage in processing power thanks to its Mediatek Helio G96 chipset. Its CPU configuration, featuring 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, represents a step up from the Oukitel WP35 S’s Helio G85 with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The Cortex-A76 cores in the G96 offer improved single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G96 provide a noticeable performance boost for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 S dominates in battery endurance with a reported 120:51h rating. This is a significant advantage over what would be expected from a phone with a similar capacity battery. The Doogee S98 Pro, while offering 33W wired and 15W wireless charging, likely has a smaller battery capacity, resulting in a shorter overall runtime. The 33W charging on the S98 Pro will significantly reduce charging times compared to the WP35 S’s 18W charging, offering a quicker top-up when access to power is available. The inclusion of 15W wireless charging on the S98 Pro is a convenience feature absent on the WP35 S.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, are frequently away from power outlets, or prioritize a lower price point. Buy the Doogee S98 Pro if you prefer a more responsive user experience, frequently engage in gaming or demanding tasks, and value the convenience of wireless charging alongside faster wired charging speeds.