Oukitel WP35 S vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing extended battery life and a lower price point, the Oukitel WP35 S emerges as the winner. Its 120:51h endurance significantly surpasses what the Cat S62 Pro can offer. However, users deeply invested in the Qualcomm ecosystem or requiring consistently stable performance under sustained loads may prefer the Cat S62 Pro.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Black |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- More modern chipset (Helio G85)
- Potentially better thermal efficiency
- Less established brand reputation
- Charging speed is moderate (18W)
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand with a rugged phone pedigree
- Qualcomm Snapdragon ecosystem benefits
- Potentially better software optimization
- Lower battery endurance compared to Oukitel
- Older, less efficient chipset (Snapdragon 660)
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given Cat’s history, the S62 Pro likely features a more color-accurate panel, optimized for outdoor visibility. The Oukitel, being a newer device, *may* incorporate a higher refresh rate, but this is speculative. The real differentiator will be the quality of the protective glass and its resistance to scratches and impacts, a key aspect of rugged phone design.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the Cat S62 Pro likely prioritizes image processing and software optimization. The Snapdragon 660’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally capable, but the Oukitel WP35 S could potentially leverage computational photography techniques to enhance image quality. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it impossible to determine which device excels in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will feature a basic camera setup geared towards documentation rather than professional photography.
Performance
The Oukitel WP35 S utilizes the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), an octa-core processor geared towards gaming and everyday tasks. Its Cortex-A75 cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, offer a performance boost over the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm). While the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores reach 2.2 GHz, the older 14nm process and potentially less efficient architecture may result in higher power consumption. The Helio G85’s newer architecture and smaller node size suggest better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to sustained performance during prolonged gaming sessions. This benefits users who rely on mobile gaming or resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 S’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance – a claimed 120:51h. This is significantly longer than what the Cat S62 Pro can likely achieve. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 660’s 14nm process is less power-efficient than the Helio G85’s 12nm process. The Oukitel also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation. The WP35 S’s 18W charging, while not the fastest, is adequate given its massive battery capacity, prioritizing longevity over rapid top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, are comfortable with a less-established brand, and prioritize value. It’s ideal for outdoor workers, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a brand with a proven track record in rugged devices, value the Qualcomm Snapdragon platform for its software support and potentially smoother performance in specific applications, and are willing to compromise on battery endurance.