Oukitel WP35 S vs. Blackview BV9300: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel WP35 S is the better choice. However, if you frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, the Blackview BV9300’s more powerful chipset and faster charging offer a noticeable advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 S | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum/titanium frame | - |
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 14.9 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 361 g (12.73 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/4", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Grey, Green, Coffee | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 390 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 S
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Blackview BV9300
- Faster and more efficient processor (Helio G99)
- Faster charging (33W) and reverse charging
- Potentially better camera performance
- Likely shorter battery life
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The BV9300’s more modern Helio G99 chipset *suggests* a higher likelihood of a higher refresh rate display, potentially offering smoother scrolling and animations. The WP35 S, focusing on endurance, may prioritize power efficiency over display features.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference *implies* the BV9300 has a more capable image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The G99’s superior processing power allows for more complex algorithms to be applied to photos and videos. It’s reasonable to assume the BV9300 will offer a more refined camera experience, though sensor size and lens quality will ultimately determine image quality.
Performance
The Blackview BV9300 clearly holds the performance advantage thanks to its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset. Built on a 6nm process, the G99 offers improved efficiency and higher clock speeds (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76) compared to the Oukitel WP35 S’s Helio G85 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75) fabricated on a 12nm node. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores are a generation ahead of the WP35 S’s A75 cores, providing a tangible boost in single-core performance. While both utilize a 6x1.8/2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the G99’s overall architecture is superior.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 S boasts an impressive 120:51h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the BV9300’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its more powerful chipset and faster 33W charging (versus the WP35 S’s 18W) represent a trade-off. The BV9300 will likely offer a quicker 0-100% charge time, and the inclusion of 5W reverse wired charging allows it to function as a power bank for smaller devices. However, the WP35 S’s longevity is a significant advantage for users who need a phone that can last for days on a single charge, and the 1000 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 S if you need a reliable, long-lasting device for work in remote locations, or if battery anxiety is a constant concern. Its 120:51h endurance provides peace of mind. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, streaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value the convenience of 33W fast charging and reverse wired charging.