Oukitel WP35 Pro vs. Doogee V30 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and slightly faster processing, the Doogee V30 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset offers a tangible advantage in demanding tasks. However, the Oukitel WP35 Pro’s exceptional 120:51h battery endurance makes it the superior choice for those needing multi-day battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 Pro | Doogee V30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 11 | 2023, October 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.2 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, portrait, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), AF 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.4", PDAF 24 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/2.2, 125˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.7" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 187 min Reverse wired | 33W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 10800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Grey, Green | Black, Orange, Silver |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower price point due to less powerful chipset
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Doogee V30 Pro
- Longer charging time (187 minutes)
Doogee V30 Pro
- Faster CPU performance (Dimensity 7050)
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Potentially smoother multitasking and gaming
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Oukitel WP35 Pro
- Charging time not specified, potentially similar to WP35 Pro
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given their rugged positioning, both likely utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. Expect IPS LCD panels for visibility in direct sunlight, a common trait in this segment. Without nit brightness or resolution data, a direct comparison is impossible, but both will likely prioritize durability over cutting-edge display technology.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications beyond the chipsets. Given the market segment, both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, but image quality will heavily depend on sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms – details not provided. Without this information, it’s impossible to assess camera performance. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size.
Performance
The Doogee V30 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset, featuring 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, represents a clear step up in CPU performance compared to the Oukitel WP35 Pro’s Dimensity 6300 (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76). The Cortex-A78 architecture in the V30 Pro is a generation newer and more efficient than the A76, translating to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, the architectural advantage favors the Doogee. Both share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the higher clock speed and superior architecture of the V30 Pro’s primary cores will be noticeable in benchmarks and real-world usage.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 Pro boasts an impressive 120:51h endurance rating, significantly exceeding what would be expected from a typical smartphone. This suggests a large battery capacity coupled with efficient power management. While both phones offer 33W wired charging, the WP35 Pro takes 187 minutes (3 hours 7 minutes) to reach 100%, indicating a larger battery capacity needing more time to fill. The Doogee V30 Pro’s charging time is not specified, but a similar capacity would likely result in a comparable charge time. The WP35 Pro’s 1000 charge cycle rating also suggests a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, prioritizing longevity over peak performance. This is ideal for extended trips, fieldwork, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Doogee V30 Pro if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, accepting a slightly shorter battery life in exchange for increased processing power.