Oukitel WP35 Pro vs. Blackview BV9200: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Oukitel WP35 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset and massive battery endurance (120:51h) outweigh the Blackview BV9200’s faster charging, making it ideal for extended off-grid use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 Pro | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 11 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.2 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, portrait, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), AF 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 187 min Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Grey, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- More efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Long-term battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Slower charging speed (187 minutes to 100%)
- Display brightness data unavailable
Blackview BV9200
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- Faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless)
- Higher contrast ratio (1423:1)
- Less efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 481 nits, compared to the Oukitel WP35 Pro (brightness data unavailable). This makes the BV9200 more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. Furthermore, the BV9200’s 1423:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the WP35 Pro’s display specs are limited, the BV9200’s panel is clearly geared towards visibility, a crucial factor for a rugged device often used in challenging lighting conditions. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are limited for both devices, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the absence of detailed sensor information suggests neither phone will excel in photography. The focus should be on functionality rather than image quality. Both likely feature basic camera setups suitable for documenting outdoor adventures, but not for serious photography. The lack of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely heavily on software processing.
Performance
The Oukitel WP35 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a more modern and efficient architecture than the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to sustained performance during demanding tasks. While both CPUs feature a similar core configuration (2x Cortex-A76 & 6x Cortex-A55), the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores operate at a higher clock speed (2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz), suggesting a performance advantage. The WP35 Pro is likely to handle multitasking and moderately intensive games more smoothly. The BV9200’s G96 is still capable, but the WP35 Pro has a clear architectural edge.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 Pro dominates in battery endurance, offering a staggering 120:51 hours of usage. This is a significant advantage over the Blackview BV9200, which lacks published endurance data. The WP35 Pro also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. While the BV9200 compensates with 66W wired and 30W wireless charging (reaching 100% in an unspecified time), the WP35 Pro’s 33W wired charging (187 minutes to 100%) is slower. However, the sheer longevity of the WP35 Pro’s battery means you’ll likely need to charge it far less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. This is the phone for campers, hikers, and anyone who values peace of mind. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prefer the convenience of rapid charging – both wired and wireless – and a brighter, more visible display, even if it means charging more often. This phone is better suited for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day and value display clarity in bright sunlight.