Oukitel WP35 Pro vs. Blackview BV8800: A Rugged Endurance Test
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the Oukitel WP35 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset and massive 120:51h endurance rating significantly outperform the Blackview BV8800’s 199h rating, making it ideal for extended off-grid use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP35 Pro | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 11 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 172.2 x 81 x 15.2 mm (6.78 x 3.19 x 0.60 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~75.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, portrait, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 187 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Grey, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 120:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Oukitel WP35 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (120:51h endurance)
- More efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Slower charging speed (187 minutes to 100%)
- Display specifications are limited
Blackview BV8800
- Faster charging (90 minutes to 100%)
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- Established Helio G96 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life (199h endurance)
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1348:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Blackview BV8800 provides a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Oukitel WP35 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the BV8800’s brightness advantage is significant for users frequently exposed to direct sunlight. The lack of information on the WP35 Pro’s panel type (IPS, AMOLED) makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the BV8800’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the rugged phone market rarely prioritizes camera quality, and both are likely to offer adequate, but not exceptional, photography experiences. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout in this category, and users shouldn't expect flagship-level image quality.
Performance
The Oukitel WP35 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.05/2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, the Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture and smaller node size will deliver superior sustained performance, particularly in demanding applications. This means the WP35 Pro will likely experience less throttling during extended gaming sessions or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP35 Pro’s battery endurance rating of 120:51h is a game-changer, dwarfing the Blackview BV8800’s 199h. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges. While the BV8800 boasts faster charging – 100% in 90 minutes versus the WP35 Pro’s 187 minutes – the sheer longevity of the WP35 Pro’s battery mitigates the charging speed difference. The WP35 Pro also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP35 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and you value efficient performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a slightly more established chipset (Helio G96) and faster charging speeds, and are willing to compromise on overall battery endurance. The BV8800 is better suited for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day.