Oukitel WP33 Pro vs. Motorola Defy 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Oukitel WP33 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer battery life (166:39h endurance) and 1100 charge cycles outweigh the Motorola Defy 2’s faster processor, especially considering the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP33 Pro | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 06 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 175.4 x 84 x 27.2 mm (6.91 x 3.31 x 1.07 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 577.5 g (1.27 lb) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~71.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.2, (night vision), 1/2.78", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (136 dB, 5W peak, 36mm speaker) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 18W reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 22000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP33 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (166:39h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Faster wired charging (33W) and reverse charging (18W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Defy 2
- Likely utilizes a less advanced display panel
Motorola Defy 2
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 930)
- Convenience of 15W wireless charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Significantly shorter battery life
- No reverse charging capability
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the WP33 Pro’s focus on value, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel. The Defy 2, positioned slightly higher in the market, may incorporate a more advanced panel, potentially AMOLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a rugged aesthetic. Without specific nit brightness data, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent beyond the chipsets. Given the market positioning, the Defy 2 likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The WP33 Pro will likely focus on providing a functional camera for basic photography. The absence of details prevents a detailed comparison of image quality and features. It's safe to assume the Defy 2 will offer better low-light performance and more detailed images.
Performance
The Motorola Defy 2 boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 930, featuring Cortex-A78 cores, which offer a performance advantage over the Cortex-A76 cores in the Oukitel WP33 Pro’s Dimensity 6100+. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. However, the 6nm fabrication process is shared between both chipsets, suggesting similar efficiency. The Defy 2’s superior CPU architecture will be most noticeable in graphically intensive tasks and demanding applications. The WP33 Pro’s Dimensity 6100+ is still a capable performer for everyday use, but won’t match the Defy 2’s peak performance.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP33 Pro’s 166:39h endurance is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what the Motorola Defy 2 can likely achieve. This is further reinforced by the WP33 Pro’s impressive 1100 charge cycles, indicating a battery designed for long-term reliability. While the Defy 2 offers 15W wireless charging, a convenience feature, the WP33 Pro compensates with 33W wired charging and 18W reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices. The WP33 Pro’s battery capacity is likely larger to achieve its endurance rating, making it the clear winner for users prioritizing battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP33 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you work or spend time in environments where access to power is limited. It’s ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who simply wants peace of mind. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications, prefer the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to compromise on battery life and potentially pay a premium.