Oukitel WP32 vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance

The rugged smartphone market is booming, offering durability alongside modern features. We pit the Oukitel WP32, focused on exceptional battery endurance, against the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro, which prioritizes processing power and fast charging. This comparison will help determine which device best suits users needing a reliable companion in demanding environments.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel WP32 is the clear winner. However, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s significantly faster charging and more powerful Mediatek Helio G99 chipset make it the better choice for users who demand smoother performance and quick power-ups.

PHONES
Phone Names Oukitel WP32 Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 19, 25, 26, 28, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, October2022, October 31
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, November 01Available. Released 2022, October 31
Body
Dimensions166 x 81.1 x 15.1 mm (6.54 x 3.19 x 0.59 in)172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight297 g (10.48 oz)290 g (10.23 oz)
 -IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant
Display
ProtectionMohs level 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~271 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)
Size5.93 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~67.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 120Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc UMS9230Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 13Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual20 MP, (wide) Secondary unspecified camera-
FeaturesLED flashTriple-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
Triple-108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights
Video1080p@30fps1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackUnspecifiedYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
BluetoothYes5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedWireless FM radio, RDS, recording
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANYesWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
Sensors-Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 -MagSafe compatible accessories
Battery
Charging-66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed
TypeLi-Po 6300 mAhLi-Po 5380 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Orange, GreenBlack
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 260 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery58:56h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass A (270 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Oukitel WP32

  • Exceptional battery endurance (58:56h)
  • High charge cycle lifespan (1000 cycles)
  • Potentially lower price point

  • Less powerful processor
  • Slower charging speeds
  • Likely limited gaming performance

Ulefone Armor 17 Pro

  • Faster and more efficient processor (Helio G99)
  • 66W fast charging and wireless charging
  • Superior image processing capabilities

  • Potentially shorter battery life
  • Higher price point
  • May require more frequent charging

Display Comparison

Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the market segment, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels for durability. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or refresh rates. Users should research independent reviews for detailed display analysis.

Camera Comparison

Without sensor details, a direct camera comparison is limited. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over camera quality. Both devices likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s chipset offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Oukitel WP32 will likely suffice for basic snapshots, but the Ulefone is expected to deliver more detailed and vibrant photos.

Performance

The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro boasts a significant performance advantage with its Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) chipset. This chip features a dual-cluster CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores for demanding tasks and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. This contrasts with the Oukitel WP32’s Unisoc UMS9230, an octa-core 2.0 GHz processor. The 6nm fabrication process of the Helio G99 also contributes to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling compared to the likely larger node process of the Unisoc chip. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Ulefone.

Battery Life

The Oukitel WP32 claims an impressive 58:56h endurance and 1000 charge cycles, indicating a focus on longevity. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging (53% in 15 minutes) and 15W wireless charging capabilities are a major advantage. The WP32’s endurance suggests a larger battery capacity, but the Ulefone’s fast charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, allowing for quick top-ups when needed. The inclusion of wireless and reverse wireless charging on the Ulefone adds further convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oukitel WP32 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases are communication, basic navigation, and occasional photography. It’s ideal for extended trips off-grid or for professionals who require a dependable device without frequent charging. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prefer a more responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the convenience of 66W fast charging and wireless charging capabilities. This phone is geared towards users who need a rugged device that can also handle demanding tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Unisoc UMS9230 in the Oukitel WP32 struggle with demanding apps like navigation or video editing?
The Unisoc UMS9230 is a capable processor for everyday tasks, but it will likely exhibit slowdowns when running resource-intensive applications like advanced navigation apps with offline maps or video editing software. It's best suited for basic functionality and communication.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro compare to standard rugged phone charging speeds?
66W charging is exceptionally fast for a rugged phone. Most rugged devices offer 18W or 33W charging at best. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s 66W charging can significantly reduce downtime, allowing you to quickly replenish the battery during short breaks.
❓ Is the 15W wireless charging on the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro practical for outdoor use?
While convenient, 15W wireless charging is slower than wired charging. It's best used in situations where a wired connection isn't feasible, such as in a vehicle or at a campsite with a portable wireless charger. It's not ideal for quickly topping up the battery.
❓ Given the rugged nature of these phones, how does the chipset choice impact long-term durability and heat management?
The Mediatek Helio G99's 6nm process is more thermally efficient than the likely larger node process used in the Unisoc UMS9230. This means the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is less prone to overheating during sustained use, potentially contributing to longer-term component reliability within the ruggedized chassis.