The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific user: those needing durability and reliability in challenging environments. The Oukitel WP32 and Cat S62 Pro both aim to fulfill this need, but they take different approaches. The WP32 prioritizes exceptional battery life, while the S62 Pro leverages a more established chipset for smoother performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel WP32 is the clear winner. While the Cat S62 Pro offers a more refined processor experience, the WP32’s impressive 58:56h endurance and 1000 charge cycles provide a significant advantage for those frequently away from power outlets.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 19, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 01 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 81.1 x 15.1 mm (6.54 x 3.19 x 0.59 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 297 g (10.48 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.93 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~67.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc UMS9230 | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, (wide)
Secondary unspecified camera | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 6300 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Orange, Green | Black |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 58:56h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP32
- Exceptional battery life (58:56h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Cost-effective rugged option
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially slower app loading times
Cat S62 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 processor
- Smoother multitasking experience
- Likely better camera image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially higher brightness. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display fidelity, so expect both to have practical, but not necessarily stunning, screens. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to contribute to shock absorption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Cat S62 Pro, being a more established brand in the rugged space, likely benefits from more refined image processing algorithms. While both phones likely feature a main camera for general photography, the Oukitel WP32 may focus on providing a functional camera for documentation purposes, while the Cat S62 Pro may aim for more aesthetically pleasing results. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Cat S62 Pro, a common feature in its class, would be a significant advantage for capturing stable photos and videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) is a significantly more powerful processor than the Oukitel WP32’s Unisoc UMS9230. The Snapdragon 660’s octa-core configuration, split between 2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage in multitasking and application loading times. The Unisoc UMS9230, while capable, is geared towards efficiency rather than raw power. This translates to a smoother experience on the Cat S62 Pro for users running multiple apps or playing moderately demanding games. The 14nm process node of the Snapdragon 660 also suggests better thermal management compared to an unknown process node for the Unisoc chip.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP32 dominates in battery endurance with a reported 58:56h of usage time and a remarkable 1000 charge cycles. This suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. The Cat S62 Pro, while likely having a respectable battery life, cannot compete with this level of longevity. The WP32’s 1000 charge cycle claim is particularly noteworthy, indicating a battery designed to withstand years of heavy use. While charging wattage isn't specified for either device, the WP32’s focus on endurance suggests it may prioritize slow, battery-preserving charging over rapid top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP32 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if your workload doesn't heavily rely on demanding applications. It's ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts on extended trips, or anyone who simply wants to minimize charging frequency. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience, particularly when multitasking or running moderately demanding apps, and are willing to trade some battery life for that performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How will the Unisoc UMS9230 in the Oukitel WP32 handle demanding apps like mapping or offline navigation?
The Unisoc UMS9230 is an efficient processor, but it's not designed for intensive tasks. While it will run mapping and navigation apps, expect slower loading times and potential lag when switching between apps or zooming in/out. For occasional use, it's sufficient, but frequent, heavy use of these apps will highlight its limitations.
❓ Is the Cat S62 Pro's Snapdragon 660 still a relevant chipset in 2024, and will it receive future software updates?
The Snapdragon 660 is an older chipset, but it remains capable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software update support is a concern. Cat phones have a history of providing updates, but the longevity of support for the S62 Pro is uncertain. Check Cat's official website for the latest software update information before purchasing.
❓ What type of charging does the Oukitel WP32 support, and how long does a full charge take?
Charging specifications for the Oukitel WP32 are not provided. Given its focus on battery longevity, it likely supports standard USB-C charging, but at a slower wattage to preserve battery health. Expect a full charge to take several hours, potentially 5-7 hours, but the extended battery life compensates for the slower charging speed.
