Oukitel WP300 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP300 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660, coupled with faster 45W charging. While the Cat S62 Pro has a proven track record, the WP300 represents a better value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP300 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 20 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 181.3 x 84.9 x 21.2 mm (7.14 x 3.34 x 0.83 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 512 g (1.13 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 650 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, 1/2.74" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 16000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Red | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 152:22h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP300
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7025
- Superior power efficiency due to the 6nm process
- 45W fast charging and reverse wired charging capabilities
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Proven durability and reliability
- Potentially more readily available accessories
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Less efficient 14nm process
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP300's focus on modern hardware, it likely features a more advanced panel with higher refresh rates and improved color accuracy. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD. The WP300's newer technology suggests a potentially more vibrant and responsive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the WP300’s newer chipset likely supports more advanced image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better image quality in various lighting conditions. The Cat S62 Pro, while capable, is limited by its older hardware. The WP300’s ISP could offer features like improved noise reduction, dynamic range, and faster autofocus. The absence of information on sensor sizes prevents a definitive judgment, but the WP300’s modern platform suggests a more capable camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP300’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7025 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 7025’s octa-core configuration (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a more modern CPU architecture than the Snapdragon 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver), resulting in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. This benefits users who rely on their phones for productivity or gaming.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP300 boasts a remarkable 152:22h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the WP300’s endurance suggests a larger battery or significantly more efficient power management. Furthermore, the WP300 supports 45W wired charging, enabling much faster recharge times compared to the Cat S62 Pro, which likely offers slower charging speeds. The WP300 also includes reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP300 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value fast charging and long-term software support. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a history in the rugged phone space, and your usage is primarily focused on basic communication, navigation, and light productivity – and you don't mind an older chipset.