Oukitel WP300 vs Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Oukitel WP300 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage, coupled with a significantly longer battery endurance rating of 152:22h, making it ideal for demanding tasks and extended outdoor use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP300 | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 20 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 181.3 x 84.9 x 21.2 mm (7.14 x 3.34 x 0.83 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 512 g (1.13 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 650 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, 1/2.74" | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 16000 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Red | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 390 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 152:22h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP300
- Superior CPU performance with the Dimensity 7025
- Exceptional battery endurance (152:22h)
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- No information on display quality
Blackview BV9300
- More affordable price
- Competent Helio G99 chipset for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Lower CPU performance compared to the WP300
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, display details are absent from the provided data. However, given the market positioning of these phones, we can infer both likely feature LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on durability rather than minimizing size. Color accuracy will likely be secondary to brightness and contrast in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged nature of these phones, image processing will likely prioritize durability and clarity in challenging conditions. We can expect both to offer decent performance in good lighting, but low-light performance will likely be a compromise. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it difficult to assess image quality beyond general expectations for this price segment.
Performance
The Oukitel WP300’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) represents a clear architectural advantage over the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (also 6nm). The Dimensity 7025 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a roughly 15-20% performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks. While both chipsets feature the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the higher clock speeds and more modern architecture of the Dimensity 7025 will result in smoother multitasking and faster application loading times. The GPU within the Dimensity 7025 will also provide a more capable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP300 boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, rated at 152:22h, compared to the Blackview BV9300’s unspecified endurance. This, combined with the WP300’s 1000 charge cycle rating, suggests a longer lifespan and reduced battery degradation over time. While the WP300 offers 45W wired charging, the BV9300 is limited to 33W. This faster charging speed will allow the WP300 to replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. Both devices offer reverse wired charging, but the WP300’s higher wattage will likely provide faster charging for accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP300 if you need a rugged phone that can handle intensive tasks like gaming or video editing, and you value long-lasting battery life above all else. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and 1000 charge cycles provide a premium experience. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize a lower price point and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like communication, social media, and light media consumption. The Helio G99 is capable, but the WP300 offers a more future-proof platform.