Oukitel WP30 Pro vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Oukitel WP30 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8050 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96, and the 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the BV8800 remains a strong contender for those prioritizing maximum battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP30 Pro | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 11 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 83.6 x 19 mm (6.98 x 3.29 x 0.75 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 413.8 g (14.60 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 430 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.33", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.78", AF, infrared night vision lights 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 50 min | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oukitel WP30 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8050)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- More efficient 6nm process node
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera specs are unknown
Blackview BV8800
- Excellent battery endurance (199h)
- Reverse wired charging
- Proven reliability in the rugged market
- Slower processor (Helio G96)
- Slower 33W charging
- Less efficient 12nm process node
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1348:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Blackview BV8800’s measured peak brightness of 501 nits is the only display specification provided. Without comparable data for the WP30 Pro, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility differences. The lack of refresh rate information for both phones suggests they likely utilize standard 60Hz panels, which may feel less fluid than higher refresh rate alternatives.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight into camera quality. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over cutting-edge camera technology, so expectations should be tempered. The absence of specific camera specs suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse.
Performance
The Oukitel WP30 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8050’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.0 GHz, promises significantly faster CPU performance. The 6nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling compared to the G96’s 12nm process. This means the WP30 Pro will handle demanding applications and games with greater ease and sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8800 boasts an endurance rating of 199 hours, indicating excellent battery life for typical usage. However, the Oukitel WP30 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 120W wired charging delivers 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 50 minutes, compared to the BV8800’s 33W charging which takes 90 minutes for a full charge. The BV8800 also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. While the WP30 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging mitigates concerns about potentially shorter runtimes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP30 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if minimizing charging time is crucial. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prioritize extended battery life above all else, and your usage primarily consists of basic communication, navigation, and occasional photography. The BV8800 is ideal for extended trips off-grid where power access is limited.