Oukitel WP28 E vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and responsiveness, the Ulefone Armor 9E emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio P90 chipset, with higher clocked Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. However, the Oukitel WP28 E’s impressive battery endurance and potentially lower price point make it a compelling option for those prioritizing longevity over raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP28 E | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 82.3 x 17.4 mm (6.86 x 3.24 x 0.69 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 373 g (13.16 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~71.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 100:16h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP28 E
- Exceptional battery endurance (100h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Slower app launch times
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Faster processor for smoother multitasking
- More responsive user experience
- Better performance in graphically intensive applications
- Shorter battery life compared to Oukitel
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels for durability and cost-effectiveness. Expect moderate brightness levels suitable for outdoor visibility, but not exceptional HDR performance. Bezels are likely to be substantial, prioritizing screen protection over a modern, edge-to-edge design. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this price range, focusing on practical usability rather than professional color grading.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't detail camera specifications beyond the chipsets. Given the rugged phone market, expect both devices to feature a primary camera focused on practicality rather than cutting-edge image quality. Lens apertures will likely be moderate, prioritizing sufficient light gathering in various conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will likely focus on enhancing contrast and saturation for visually appealing results, rather than striving for natural color accuracy.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor 9E’s MediaTek Helio P90 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the Oukitel WP28 E’s Unisoc T606 with 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This 600 MHz clock speed difference, coupled with the slightly faster Cortex-A55 cores (2.0 GHz vs 1.6 GHz), translates to a tangible performance advantage for the Ulefone in CPU-intensive tasks. While both are 12nm chips, the Helio P90’s architecture is more mature and optimized for performance. The Unisoc T606 prioritizes efficiency, contributing to the Oukitel’s longer battery life, but at the cost of responsiveness. The impact will be most noticeable when multitasking, launching apps, or playing graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP28 E boasts a 100-hour endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, indicating a significant focus on battery longevity. While the Ulefone Armor 9E’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the more powerful Helio P90 chipset will inevitably consume more power. Both devices share an 18W wired charging capability, suggesting similar 0-100% charging times – likely around 2.5 to 3.5 hours. The Oukitel’s advantage lies in its ability to stretch a single charge further, making it ideal for users who spend extended periods away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP28 E if you need a reliably durable phone with exceptional battery life for extended field work or travel where frequent charging isn't possible. It’s ideal for users who primarily use basic apps and prioritize longevity. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, or running demanding applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for increased processing power. This phone suits users who need a rugged device that can also handle everyday smartphone tasks with ease.