Oukitel WP28 E vs Cubot KingKong Star 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Cubot KingKong Star 2 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the Oukitel WP28 E excels in battery endurance, making it ideal for extended off-grid use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP28 E | Cubot KingKong Star 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, , 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July | 2024, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.2 x 82.3 x 17.4 mm (6.86 x 3.24 x 0.69 in) | 177.7 x 81.8 x 13.5 mm (7.00 x 3.22 x 0.53 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 373 g (13.16 oz) | 305 g (10.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~71.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~75.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 32 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 100:16h endurance, 1000 cycles | 43:41h endurance, 900 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class C |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Oukitel WP28 E
- Exceptional battery endurance (100 hours)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Significantly lower processing power
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less capable for demanding tasks
Cubot KingKong Star 2
- Flagship-level performance (Dimensity 8200)
- Faster charging (33W)
- Superior gaming and multitasking capabilities
- Shorter battery endurance (43 hours)
- Lower battery lifespan (900 cycles)
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Star 2's focus on performance, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the WP28 E. The WP28 E, positioned as an endurance device, may prioritize power efficiency over display fidelity. Expect both to feature ruggedized glass, but details like peak brightness and color accuracy remain unknown.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the Star 2’s higher processing power suggests more sophisticated image processing capabilities. The Unisoc T606 in the WP28 E will likely struggle with complex computational photography tasks. Both devices likely include a standard set of lenses, but the Star 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume both will have a macro lens, but its utility is limited on both devices.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Cubot KingKong Star 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a flagship-class chipset featuring a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Oukitel WP28 E’s Unisoc T606 (12nm) with its 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Dimensity 8200 will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the T606 is better suited for everyday tasks. The 4nm process also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP28 E boasts a remarkable 100-hour endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, indicating a focus on long-term battery health and extended use between charges. In contrast, the Cubot KingKong Star 2 offers 43 hours of endurance and 900 cycles. While the Star 2’s 33W charging is significantly faster than the WP28 E’s 18W, the difference in endurance is substantial. The WP28 E is designed for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency, while the Star 2 offers quicker top-ups but requires more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP28 E if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency. This is the phone for extended camping trips or jobsites with limited power access. Buy the Cubot KingKong Star 2 if you prefer a snappy, responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and are willing to charge more frequently to unlock that performance.