The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. Both the Oukitel WP23 and Blackview BV9200 aim to deliver on that promise, but they diverge significantly in their approach to performance and features. The WP23 prioritizes extended battery life, while the BV9200 focuses on a more modern chipset and faster charging capabilities, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and price, the Blackview BV9200 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the WP23’s Helio P35, and the inclusion of 66W wired and 30W wireless charging is a significant convenience advantage. While the WP23 boasts impressive battery endurance, the BV9200’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 / 1900 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Reverse wired | 66W wired
30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 100:32h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP23
- Exceptional battery endurance (100:32h)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging for emergency power sharing
- Outdated Helio P35 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Lack of fast charging options
Blackview BV9200
- More powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Bright and high-contrast display (481 nits, 1423:1)
- 66W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Battery endurance likely lower than WP23
- Battery capacity not specified
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 481 nits, compared to the Oukitel WP23 (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight, a crucial factor for outdoor use. Furthermore, the BV9200’s 1423:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the WP23’s display specifications are not provided, the BV9200’s panel offers a demonstrably superior viewing experience, particularly for media consumption and outdoor work.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited for both devices. However, given the market segment, it’s safe to assume both phones prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The absence of detailed sensor information suggests neither phone will compete with flagship camera systems. The focus is likely on providing functional cameras for documentation and basic photography in rugged environments. Without further data, a direct comparison is difficult, but the BV9200’s chipset likely offers better image signal processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BV9200’s Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Oukitel WP23’s Helio P35 (12nm) with its 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. The Cortex-A76 cores in the G96 offer a substantial performance improvement over the A53 cores in the P35, resulting in faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The G96’s architecture is more efficient, despite both being built on a 12nm process, leading to better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP23 claims an impressive 100-hour 32-minute endurance and 1000 battery cycles, suggesting a focus on longevity. While the BV9200’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its charging capabilities are a major advantage. The BV9200 supports 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the WP23’s reverse wired charging only. This difference in charging speed is crucial for users who need to quickly replenish their battery during short breaks. The WP23’s endurance is valuable, but the BV9200’s charging flexibility is more practical for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP23 if you absolutely need maximum battery life and are willing to compromise on processing power for tasks beyond basic communication and navigation. This phone is ideal for extended trips off-grid or for professionals who rely on their phone throughout exceptionally long workdays. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of rapid charging, making it better suited for everyday use and moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G96 in the Blackview BV9200 get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the Helio G96 is more powerful than the P35, it's still a mid-range chipset. Expect some heat generation during prolonged gaming, but the BV9200’s rugged design likely incorporates heat dissipation features to mitigate throttling. The P35 in the WP23 will likely throttle sooner due to its lower performance ceiling.
❓ How does the reverse wired charging on the Oukitel WP23 compare to standard power banks in terms of charging speed?
The reverse wired charging on the WP23 is primarily intended for emergency situations, not as a replacement for a dedicated power bank. It will likely deliver a slower charging speed than a typical power bank, prioritizing convenience over rapid replenishment. Expect it to be useful for topping up small devices like earbuds or smartwatches.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a sign of poor camera quality?
Not necessarily. These phones are targeted towards users who prioritize durability and battery life over camera performance. The cameras are likely adequate for basic documentation and snapshots, but shouldn't be compared to flagship smartphone cameras. Expect functional, rather than exceptional, image quality.
