Oukitel WP23 Plus vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and a lower price point, the Oukitel WP23 Plus is the clear winner. Its 100-hour battery endurance significantly outpaces the Nokia XR20. However, if 5G connectivity and faster processing are essential, the Nokia XR20 offers a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP23 Plus | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174 x 82.3 x 17.1 mm (6.85 x 3.24 x 0.67 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 378 g (13.33 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 576 x 1280 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~213 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~73.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 2 MP (macro), 1/5" | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10600 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 100:32h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP23 Plus
- Exceptional 100+ hour battery life
- 1000 charge cycle battery longevity
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed (15W)
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging convenience
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price compared to the Oukitel
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing for both, but the focus is clearly on durability, not visual fidelity. The absence of LTPO or high refresh rates suggests cost optimization. The real-world impact will be similar viewing experiences, prioritizing visibility in direct sunlight over color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the XR20’s Snapdragon 480 typically includes a more capable image signal processor (ISP) than the T606, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the XR20 likely offers a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Oukitel WP23 Plus’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The smaller 8nm node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration, the XR20’s Kryo 460 cores clock higher (2.0 GHz vs 1.6 GHz), suggesting faster processing speeds for demanding tasks. This difference will be noticeable in app loading times and multitasking, benefiting users who frequently switch between applications or engage in moderate gaming.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP23 Plus dominates in battery endurance with a claimed 100 hours and 32 minutes of usage. This is a substantial lead over what’s typical for a smartphone with 5G capabilities. While the Nokia XR20 offers the convenience of 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, the WP23 Plus’s longevity mitigates the need for frequent charging. The WP23 Plus also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation. The 15W charging on the Oukitel is slower than the Nokia's 18W, but the sheer capacity of the battery makes this less of a concern.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP23 Plus if you need a phone that can last for days on a single charge, work reliably in harsh environments, and don't require the latest 5G speeds. This is ideal for outdoor workers, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a more polished software experience, need 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and value wireless charging convenience, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.