Oukitel WP200 vs. Doogee S99: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP200 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency over the Doogee S99’s Helio G96. However, the S99’s wireless charging and potentially lower price point make it a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 | Doogee S99 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March | 2022, December 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 21 | Available. Released 2022, December 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/1.8, 130˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired, 45% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Gray | Gold, Black |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Oukitel WP200
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Faster 45W wired charging
- More efficient 4nm process node for better battery life
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially higher price point
Doogee S99
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially more affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Less efficient 12nm process node
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP200's higher-end chipset, it's reasonable to expect a display with higher peak brightness and potentially a faster refresh rate. The S99, targeting a lower price bracket, likely features a more standard LCD panel. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility should investigate the WP200's nit rating when available.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the WP200’s more powerful processor allows for more sophisticated image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The S99’s Helio G96 will likely rely more on software optimization to compensate for hardware limitations. It's crucial to examine sample photos and videos from both devices to assess real-world image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP200’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Doogee S99’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8200’s architecture – featuring a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides substantially more processing power and efficiency. The 4nm process node translates to lower heat generation and improved battery life under load. The Helio G96, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games or applications. The WP200 will offer a noticeably smoother experience in graphically intensive scenarios.
Battery Life
Both phones offer robust battery life due to their rugged nature and likely large battery capacities (specs not provided). However, the WP200’s Dimensity 8200’s superior efficiency will contribute to longer runtimes, especially during demanding tasks. The WP200’s 45W wired charging is significantly faster than the S99’s 33W, allowing for quicker top-ups. The S99 compensates with 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the WP200. The S99 claims 45% charge in 30 minutes with its 33W charger, while the WP200’s 45W should achieve a higher percentage in the same timeframe.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset ensures a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the Doogee S99 if you prioritize a balance of ruggedness, affordability, and convenience features like wireless charging, and your primary use case doesn’t involve intensive processing.