Oukitel WP200 vs. Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP200 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96. However, the BV9200’s 66W charging and brighter display make it a compelling option for those valuing convenience and outdoor visibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Gray | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
Oukitel WP200
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 8200)
- More efficient 4nm fabrication process
- Superior performance for gaming and demanding apps
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- No wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown, potentially lower brightness
Blackview BV9200
- Faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless)
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- Good contrast ratio (1423:1)
- Less powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- Lower performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a measured peak brightness of 481 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial feature for a rugged device. While the Oukitel WP200’s display specifications are not provided, the BV9200’s brightness advantage is significant. The contrast ratio on the BV9200 also suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. Users frequently exposed to bright environments will find the BV9200’s display more practical.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the WP200 will have a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The WP200’s processing power allows for more complex computational photography algorithms. The BV9200 will likely rely more on software optimization to compensate for its less powerful ISP.
Performance
The Oukitel WP200’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8200’s octa-core CPU, featuring a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The 4nm fabrication process also translates to better thermal management, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio G96, while capable, is geared towards mid-range performance and will struggle with demanding games or multitasking compared to the WP200. The WP200’s architecture is designed for a smoother, more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV9200’s 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging provide a significant convenience advantage over the Oukitel WP200’s 45W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speeds on the BV9200 mean less downtime. The addition of wireless charging is a further benefit for users who prefer cable-free convenience. The WP200’s 45W charging is respectable, but the BV9200 offers a quicker top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior chipset ensures smooth performance and longevity. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize fast charging, a brighter screen for outdoor use, and a more balanced, everyday experience without the need for extreme processing power.