Oukitel WP200 vs Blackview BL8800 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP200 is the clear winner thanks to its Dimensity 8200. However, the Blackview BL8800 Pro remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers who need a reliable, 5G-capable rugged phone for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 | Blackview BL8800 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 21 | Available. Released 2022, May 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 2x Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Gray | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
Oukitel WP200
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Faster 45W charging
- Potentially better camera performance due to ISP and sensor size
- Likely higher price
- Potentially larger size/weight due to more powerful components
Blackview BL8800 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Durable rugged design
- Acceptable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Dimensity 700)
- Slower 33W charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP200's positioning as a more premium device, it's reasonable to expect a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate. Blackview typically focuses on value, so the BL8800 Pro likely prioritizes durability over display extravagance. Bezels are likely similar, given the rugged design constraints of both phones.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs beyond the mention of a 200MP camera on the WP200 (which is not in the provided context), a detailed comparison is difficult. However, the WP200’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 8200 will likely result in better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The larger sensor associated with a 200MP camera, if well-implemented, will capture more detail and offer greater dynamic range. The BL8800 Pro’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality for social media and casual use. We can assume the 2MP macro camera on both devices will offer limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP200’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a significant leap over the Blackview BL8800 Pro’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 8200 features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the 700’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to approximately 30-40% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The 4nm process node of the 8200 also offers superior thermal efficiency, meaning the WP200 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the 8200’s GPU will provide a far more capable gaming experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the WP200’s 45W wired charging is considerably faster than the BL8800 Pro’s 33W charging. Blackview claims 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. The WP200 should achieve a full charge significantly faster. Both phones offer reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The faster charging speed of the WP200 is a significant convenience factor, especially for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, or multitasking without slowdowns. Its superior chipset will provide a smoother, longer-lasting experience. Buy the Blackview BL8800 Pro if you prioritize affordability and a durable build for basic smartphone use, such as communication, navigation, and light media consumption. It’s a practical choice for those who don’t require top-tier processing power.