Oukitel WP200 Pro vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Rugged Performance Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing demanding tasks like gaming or video editing in the field, the Oukitel WP200 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset delivers significantly higher performance. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T offers a compelling package for everyday use with faster charging and a more efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 Pro | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 24GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP200 Pro
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Exceptional battery endurance (86:17h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Potentially higher operating temperatures under load
- Slower charging speed (45W) compared to the 19T
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Faster wired charging (66W, 52% in 30 min)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- More efficient processor (Helio G99) for cooler operation
- Less powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Lower overall performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP200 Pro's focus on high performance, it's reasonable to expect a higher resolution and potentially higher refresh rate panel. The Ulefone 19T likely prioritizes efficiency, potentially resulting in a slightly lower resolution or refresh rate to conserve battery. Bezels and color accuracy will likely be comparable within the rugged phone segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the WP200 Pro's higher processing power suggests more sophisticated image processing capabilities. The Ulefone 19T's Helio G99 will still be capable of producing good images in ideal conditions, but may struggle more with low-light photography or complex scenes. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the WP200 Pro's chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Oukitel WP200 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) boasts a core configuration of 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55, offering significantly more processing power than the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 also provides better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a superior gaming experience for the WP200 Pro. The Helio G99, while capable, is geared towards efficient performance rather than outright speed.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP200 Pro claims an impressive 86:17h endurance and 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on longevity. While the Ulefone Power Armor 19T doesn't provide endurance figures, it compensates with faster charging: 66W wired (52% in 30 minutes), 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless. The WP200 Pro offers 45W wired and reverse wired charging. The 19T’s faster wired charging is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery, while the WP200 Pro prioritizes overall battery lifespan and sustained usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for resource-intensive applications, extended battery life for multi-day expeditions, and don't mind a potentially warmer device under heavy load. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prefer a more balanced device with faster charging speeds, wireless charging convenience, and a cooler operating temperature for typical daily use and moderate gaming.