Oukitel WP200 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP200 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, while the 45W charging is a substantial upgrade. The Cat S62 Pro remains a viable option for those needing a proven, albeit slower, rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 24GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP200 Pro
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 8200
- 45W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Longer battery endurance (86:17h)
- Potential for software bloat (common with Oukitel)
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness
- Proven durability and reliability
- Simpler software experience (potentially)
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the Cat S62 Pro's age, it likely features an older LCD panel with lower brightness and color accuracy compared to what Oukitel would offer in 2024. The WP200 Pro, being a newer device, likely benefits from a more modern panel, potentially with higher resolution and improved viewing angles. The lack of information prevents a precise comparison, but the WP200 Pro is expected to have a superior display experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the WP200 Pro's marketing often emphasizes high megapixel counts, suggesting a focus on image detail. While megapixel count isn't everything, a newer sensor paired with the Dimensity 8200’s image signal processor (ISP) will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Cat S62 Pro’s older Snapdragon 660 ISP will struggle to match the WP200 Pro’s processing capabilities. Without specific sensor size and aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the WP200 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable camera system.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Oukitel WP200 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core (3.1 GHz). This contrasts sharply with the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm), which utilizes a more modest octa-core setup. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 8200 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the WP200 Pro will sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. Users who engage in gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive tasks will experience a dramatically smoother and faster experience on the WP200 Pro.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP200 Pro boasts an impressive 86:17h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. Coupled with its 45W wired charging, it offers a rapid recharge time. The Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but given its older chipset and likely smaller battery, it will require more frequent charging. The WP200 Pro’s 45W charging is a significant advantage, allowing users to quickly top up the battery when needed, while the Cat S62 Pro likely relies on slower charging speeds. The 1000 charge cycle rating of the WP200 Pro also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value fast charging and long-term software support. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a proven track record in ruggedness, and your usage primarily consists of basic communication, navigation, and light productivity tasks, and you are less concerned with raw processing power.