Oukitel WP200 Pro vs. Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and extended battery life, the Oukitel WP200 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power compared to the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the BV9200’s wireless charging and lower price point make it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel WP200 Pro | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 311 g (10.97 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 24GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.74" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel WP200 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Exceptional 86:17h battery endurance
- 1000 charge cycle battery longevity
- Display specifications currently unknown
- No wireless charging
Blackview BV9200
- More affordable price point
- Convenient 66W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Solid 481 nits peak brightness
- Less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life compared to WP200 Pro
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 provides a measured peak brightness of 481 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, offering a reasonably viewable experience. However, the Oukitel WP200 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the WP200 Pro’s higher overall positioning, we anticipate a comparable or superior display quality. The BV9200’s contrast ratio suggests a solid IPS panel, but lacks the dynamic range of OLED displays found in some competitors. Without knowing the WP200 Pro’s panel type, it’s difficult to assess potential advantages like color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Neither device’s camera specifications are detailed enough to draw definitive conclusions. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes megapixel count over sensor size and image processing. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. We can assume both phones will include a suite of software enhancements to improve image quality, but the Dimensity 8200’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the WP200 Pro likely provides a more robust foundation for image processing.
Performance
The Oukitel WP200 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) chipset is the star of the show. Its octa-core configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – delivers significantly higher processing power than the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 8200’s more advanced 4nm process node translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio G96, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and applications compared to the WP200 Pro. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who engage in mobile gaming or content creation.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP200 Pro boasts an impressive 86:17h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Blackview BV9200’s battery capacity is not specified, its 66W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities offer convenient recharging options. The WP200 Pro’s 45W wired charging, coupled with its 1000 charge cycle battery longevity, indicates a focus on long-term battery health. The BV9200’s wireless charging is a notable advantage for users who prefer cable-free convenience, but the WP200 Pro’s endurance likely outweighs this benefit for those prioritizing extended usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel WP200 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and require exceptional battery endurance for extended outdoor use. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize a lower price point, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and primarily use your phone for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.