Oukitel RT9 vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained operation and value, the Oukitel RT9 is the better choice. Its exceptional 302-hour battery endurance and 1000 charge cycles outweigh the Armor 17 Pro’s performance gains, especially considering the price difference likely exists. However, users demanding quicker app loading and smoother multitasking will benefit from the Armor 17 Pro.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT9 | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170 x 14.2 mm (9.89 x 6.69 x 0.56 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 850 g (1.87 lb) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", AF | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 302:10h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel RT9
- Exceptional battery life (302h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster processor (Helio G99)
- Significantly faster charging (66W)
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Shorter battery life (estimated)
- Potentially higher price
- Increased power consumption
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Armor 17 Pro’s focus on performance, it’s reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel than the RT9. The RT9’s Unisoc T606 chipset may struggle to consistently drive a high refresh rate, impacting smoothness. The Armor 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, is more capable of handling a higher refresh rate display without significant performance drops.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is difficult. However, the Armor 17 Pro’s more powerful chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The RT9’s T606 is adequate for basic photography, but will likely struggle with complex scenes or low-light conditions. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it difficult to assess video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 represents a significant leap in processing power over the Oukitel RT9’s Unisoc T606. The G99 utilizes 2x Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the RT9’s 2x Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the more efficient 6nm manufacturing process of the G99 versus the RT9’s 12nm process, translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Armor 17 Pro will handle demanding apps and games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Oukitel RT9 boasts an impressive 302-hour endurance rating, a testament to the efficiency of the Unisoc T606 chipset. While the Armor 17 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its more powerful Helio G99 will consume more power. The RT9 also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself. The Armor 17 Pro compensates with 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 53% charge in just 15 minutes, a massive advantage over the RT9’s 18W charging. The Armor 17 Pro also offers 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the RT9.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT9 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and if you work in environments where access to power is limited. This is the phone for construction workers, long-haul truckers, or anyone who frequently spends time off-grid. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of incredibly rapid 66W charging – ideal for users who need to quickly top up their phone between tasks.