Oukitel RT9 vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and value, the Oukitel RT9 is the clear winner. Its impressive 302-hour endurance and 1000-cycle battery life significantly outperform the Nokia XR20. However, if 5G connectivity and wireless charging are essential, the XR20 offers a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT9 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170 x 14.2 mm (9.89 x 6.69 x 0.56 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 850 g (1.87 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", AF | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 302:10h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel RT9
- Exceptional battery life (302h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Unisoc T606)
- No 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging support
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 480)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price
- Potentially less durable battery longevity
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing, but the focus here is clearly on durability, not visual fidelity. The absence of LTPO or high refresh rates suggests both prioritize power efficiency. Bezels are likely substantial on both, given their ruggedized designs. Color accuracy is expected to be adequate, but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the XR20’s Snapdragon 480 typically includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) than the Unisoc T606, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment difficult. It's safe to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but image processing algorithms will likely be the key differentiator, favoring the XR20.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Oukitel RT9’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The smaller 8nm node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the XR20 to sustain higher performance for longer periods. While the XR20’s CPU clocks slightly higher (2.0 GHz vs 1.6 GHz), the real-world difference will be most noticeable in sustained tasks like gaming or video editing. The XR20’s Adreno GPU will also provide a more capable graphics experience. The RT9 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the XR20 offers a smoother, more responsive experience, particularly with 5G applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel RT9’s 302-hour endurance is its standout feature. This is a substantial lead over what the Nokia XR20 can likely achieve. While the XR20 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, the RT9’s 1000-cycle battery rating suggests exceptional longevity, meaning it will maintain a higher capacity over a longer period of use. The RT9’s 18W wired charging is comparable to the XR20’s, but the sheer capacity advantage of the RT9’s battery overshadows this difference. Expect the RT9 to easily last two full days, even with moderate use, while the XR20 will likely require daily charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT9 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, are frequently outdoors or in demanding work environments, and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you require 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, value the convenience of wireless charging, and prefer a phone with a more established brand reputation and software support.