Oukitel RT9 vs Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and infrequent charging, the Oukitel RT9 is the clear winner thanks to its exceptional 302-hour endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles. However, the Blackview BV8800 offers a significantly smoother experience for gaming and demanding tasks, justifying its shorter battery life for performance-focused individuals.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT9 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170 x 14.2 mm (9.89 x 6.69 x 0.56 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 850 g (1.87 lb) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 11000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 302:10h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel RT9
- Exceptional 302-hour battery life
- 1000 charge cycles for long-term battery health
- Reverse wired charging for emergency power sharing
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
Blackview BV8800
- Faster 33W charging (100% in 90 minutes)
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G96 chipset
- Higher display brightness (501 nits)
- Significantly shorter 199-hour battery life
- Lower battery cycle count (unspecified)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a 1348:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility – a key consideration for rugged phones. While the RT9’s display specs are absent, the BV8800’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the RT9’s panel type (IPS, AMOLED) makes a direct comparison of color accuracy difficult, but the BV8800’s contrast ratio indicates a decent viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a camera is noted, but neither phone appears to be targeting photography enthusiasts. It's safe to assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The omission of details suggests neither camera is a primary selling point.
Performance
The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset, featuring 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, represents a significant performance leap over the Oukitel RT9’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The G96’s Cortex-A76 cores offer superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the architectural advantages of the G96 make it the better choice for gaming and resource-intensive applications. The RT9’s T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Oukitel RT9 dominates in battery endurance with a staggering 302 hours, compared to the Blackview BV8800’s 199 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges. However, the BV8800 compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. The RT9’s 18W charging is considerably slower. The RT9 also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting superior long-term battery health. The BV8800’s faster charging is convenient, but the RT9’s longevity and overall endurance are more impactful for users prioritizing uptime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT9 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, are frequently outdoors with limited access to power, or require a device with exceptional battery health longevity (1000 cycles). Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or frequently use demanding applications, and are willing to charge your phone more often.