Oukitel RT8 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and modern performance, the Oukitel RT8 emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset and 499-hour endurance significantly outperform the Cat S62 Pro’s aging Snapdragon 660. However, the Cat S62 Pro’s brand reputation and potentially more refined software experience may appeal to those valuing established reliability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT8 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 265.1 x 176.7 x 15.1 mm (10.44 x 6.96 x 0.59 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 996.7 g (2.20 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~74.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.78", AF, infrared night vision lights 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 20000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Black/Orange | Black |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 499:59h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Oukitel RT8
- Exceptional battery life (499h endurance)
- Modern and efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging with reverse charging
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Display specifications are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in rugged devices
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Durable build quality (inherent to the Cat brand)
- Aging Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life expected
- Likely slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S62 Pro’s release date, it likely utilizes an older LCD panel. The Oukitel RT8, being a newer device, may benefit from advancements in display technology, potentially offering improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data suggests neither prioritizes a fluid visual experience, focusing instead on durability and power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of these devices suggests the Cat S62 Pro may prioritize image processing geared towards practical use cases like documentation, while the Oukitel RT8 might lean towards more vibrant, social media-friendly images. The absence of sensor size data makes it impossible to determine low-light performance capabilities. It’s safe to assume neither device will compete with flagship smartphone cameras, but the newer chipset in the RT8 could offer more advanced image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel RT8’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant leap forward compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Helio G99 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained loads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Helio G99’s Cortex-A76 cores offer superior single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and everyday tasks. The Snapdragon 660, while capable, is showing its age and will likely struggle with demanding applications and modern games compared to the RT8.
Battery Life
The Oukitel RT8’s 499-hour endurance is a standout feature, dwarfing what’s typically expected from a rugged smartphone. This, combined with its 1000-cycle battery lifespan claim, positions it as a leader in longevity. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the older, less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset will undoubtedly result in significantly shorter battery life. The RT8’s 33W wired charging is also faster than what the S62 Pro likely offers, reducing downtime between charges. The RT8’s reverse wired charging adds further versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT8 if you need exceptional battery life for extended fieldwork, frequent use of power-hungry apps, or value a more modern processor for smoother multitasking and gaming. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a brand with a long history in rugged devices, potentially benefiting from more mature software and a wider ecosystem of accessories, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest processing power.