Oukitel RT7 5G vs. Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: A Deep Dive into Rugged Phone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Oukitel RT7 5G emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer battery endurance (166:39h vs 88:30h) and respectable performance make it ideal for extended outdoor use. However, users demanding faster processing and charging will find the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT7 5G | Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 249.1 x 167.8 x 19.8 mm (9.81 x 6.61 x 0.78 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1212 g (2.67 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.78", AF, infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) 5 MP, f/2.2, (FLIR thermal camera, Lepton module) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 32000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 1300 cycles | 88:30h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class D | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Oukitel RT7 5G
- Exceptional battery life (166:39h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1300 cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 720)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
- Faster processor (Dimensity 7050)
- Faster charging (66W wired, wireless charging)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Significantly shorter battery life (88:30h endurance)
- Lower battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature ruggedized LCD panels given their target market. The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra, benefiting from a newer chipset, may have a slightly more refined display experience. However, without specific data on brightness, resolution, or color accuracy, it's difficult to definitively assess display quality. The RT7's focus on endurance suggests a potentially more power-efficient panel, even if it's not as visually striking.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset advantage of the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra suggests potentially better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, leading to improved image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both phones likely feature multiple cameras, but the RT7’s focus on value may mean compromises in sensor quality compared to the 18T Ultra. We can assume both will have a primary sensor, but the 18T Ultra is more likely to have a larger sensor and more advanced features.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), a clear upgrade over the Oukitel RT7 5G’s Dimensity 720 (7nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to potentially higher sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz) are also more powerful than the RT7’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.0 GHz), resulting in faster app launches and smoother multitasking. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
The Oukitel RT7 5G dominates in battery endurance with a reported 166:39h, significantly exceeding the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra’s 88:30h. This difference is substantial and highlights the RT7’s core strength. While the 18T Ultra compensates with 66W wired charging (52% in 30 minutes) and wireless charging options (15W/5W reversed), the RT7’s longevity is unmatched. The RT7’s 1300 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself, while the 18T Ultra offers 1000 cycles.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT7 5G if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. It’s the perfect companion for camping, construction work, or any activity where battery anxiety is a concern. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra if you prioritize faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and the convenience of 66W fast charging, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.