Oukitel RT5 vs Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Cat S75 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 930 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Oukitel RT5’s MT8788. However, the RT5 presents a compelling value proposition for those on a tighter budget who don't require demanding applications.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT5 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170 x 14.2 mm (9.89 x 6.69 x 0.56 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 860 g (1.90 lb) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 14GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Oukitel RT5
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
- Lacks wireless charging
Cat S75
- Superior processing power (Dimensity 930)
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- Wireless charging support
- Higher price tag
- Lacks reverse charging
- Potentially smaller battery capacity (unconfirmed)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S75's higher-end chipset, it's reasonable to expect a display with better color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so expect both to feature robust glass protection, but potentially lower resolutions than flagship smartphones. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to accommodate the ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Cat S75 will benefit from a more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 930, leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the S75 is more likely to have a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in superior low-light performance. The RT5 may rely heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Oukitel RT5’s Mediatek MT8788 (12nm). The Dimensity 930 utilizes more efficient 6nm fabrication, resulting in lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. Its CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is architecturally superior to the RT5’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup, offering faster single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the S75. The RT5 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging offers a convenience the Oukitel RT5 lacks. The RT5 compensates with 18W wired charging *and* reverse wired charging, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 930 in the S75 should contribute to better battery efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity compared to the RT5. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the S75’s efficiency advantage is a significant factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT5 if you need a highly affordable, durable phone for basic tasks like communication, navigation, and light media consumption, and appreciate the convenience of reverse wired charging. Buy the Cat S75 if you prioritize smooth multitasking, gaming, and a more responsive user experience, and value the convenience of wireless charging, even at a higher price point.