Oukitel RT5 vs Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview BV9200 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 66W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Oukitel RT5 offers a more affordable entry point, the BV9200’s improvements justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT5 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170 x 14.2 mm (9.89 x 6.69 x 0.56 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 860 g (1.90 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 14GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oukitel RT5
- More affordable price point
- Durable build quality (expected of the brand)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower processor for demanding tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely dimmer display
Blackview BV9200
- Faster and more efficient Helio G96 chipset
- 66W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Higher price compared to the Oukitel RT5
- Potentially larger size and weight due to larger battery/charging components
- Rugged design may add bulk
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a clear advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 481 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a key requirement for rugged phones. While the Oukitel RT5’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The BV9200’s 1423:1 contrast ratio further enhances image clarity and depth, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO or high refresh rate information for either device suggests both are standard LCD panels, but the BV9200’s brightness is a significant differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over camera quality. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither device will excel in low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution. Image processing will likely be the key differentiator, but without sample images, it’s impossible to assess.
Performance
The Blackview BV9200’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset, featuring 2x Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz and 6x Cortex-A55 cores, represents a substantial upgrade over the Oukitel RT5’s MT8788. The G96’s architecture prioritizes single-core performance, leading to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 12nm process, the G96’s newer core design provides a performance advantage. The RT5’s MT8788, with its 4x Cortex-A73 and 4x Cortex-A53 cores, is geared towards efficiency but will struggle with demanding applications. The BV9200 is the clear winner for users who play mobile games or run resource-intensive apps.
Battery Life
The charging capabilities are where the Blackview BV9200 truly shines. Its 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging capabilities drastically reduce charging times compared to the Oukitel RT5’s 18W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the BV9200 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. A full charge on the BV9200 will take significantly less time, crucial for users who rely heavily on their phone throughout the day. The RT5’s 18W charging is adequate for overnight charging but will be slow for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT5 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic functionality for light tasks like communication and navigation. It’s ideal for users who need a durable phone but don’t demand high performance. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you value faster performance for gaming or multitasking, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and significantly quicker charging speeds – making it perfect for those constantly on the move.