Oukitel RT3 vs Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and smoother performance, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 5G chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Oukitel RT3’s Helio P22, and the inclusion of wireless charging adds convenience. However, the RT3 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel RT3 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | - | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.53", AF 0.3 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Oukitel RT3
- Highly affordable price point
- Ruggedized design for durability
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Outdated and less powerful Helio P22 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Wireless charging for added convenience
- Higher price compared to the Oukitel RT3
- Rugged design may add bulk
- Software update commitment is limited compared to flagship Nokia phones
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type and resolution are missing for both, but the focus is clearly on durability, not visual fidelity. The absence of high refresh rates is expected in this segment. The RT3's display is likely a standard LCD, while the XR20 may have a slightly better IPS panel. Without specific brightness data, it's difficult to assess outdoor visibility, but the XR20's Qualcomm chipset *could* allow for more efficient display power management.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but the focus here isn't on photography prowess. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards functional image capture. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The XR20’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 480 likely offers superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The RT3 will likely rely on software processing to compensate for its less capable chipset.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, fabricated on an 8nm process, is substantially more efficient and powerful than the Oukitel RT3’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The Snapdragon 480’s octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) provides a noticeable boost in multi-core performance compared to the RT3’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained use. The RT3 will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Nokia XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging capabilities provide a significant convenience advantage over the RT3’s wired charging only. The more efficient Snapdragon 480 chipset could also contribute to longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the RT3. Wireless charging is a key differentiator for users who value convenience and want to avoid wear and tear on the charging port.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel RT3 if you need a highly affordable, extremely durable phone for basic tasks like communication and light media consumption, and aren't concerned with 5G or demanding applications. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity, a more responsive user experience, longer software support, and the convenience of wireless charging, even at a higher price point.