Oukitel P1 vs. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Ruggedness
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and modern performance, the Oukitel P1 emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset, coupled with exceptional 53-hour battery endurance, offers a compelling package. However, the XCover Pro remains a viable option for those deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem or requiring specific enterprise features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel P1 | Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 20, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2020, January |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2020, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 76.7 x 10 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.8 g (6.60 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 25 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/56", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/k/v/r, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4050 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Black |
| Models | - | SM-G715FN/DS, SM-G715FN, SM-G715F, SM-G715W, SM-G715U, SM-G715U1 |
| Price | $ 164.41 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 53:11h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel P1
- Exceptional battery life (53:11h endurance)
- Modern and efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Potentially better value for money
- Limited brand recognition
- Display specifications are unknown
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
- Samsung brand reliability and ecosystem integration
- Ruggedized design and build quality
- Potential for enterprise-level support
- Older and less efficient Exynos 9611 chipset
- Slower 15W charging
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing for the Oukitel P1, but the XCover Pro’s display is likely a standard LCD panel. The focus here isn’t on visual fidelity, but on readability in bright sunlight and durability. The Oukitel P1’s lack of display specs suggests a more budget-oriented approach, potentially sacrificing color accuracy and peak brightness for cost savings. The XCover Pro’s ruggedization likely includes a reinforced display, but at the expense of advanced features like high refresh rates or HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. The XCover Pro likely features a more refined image processing pipeline thanks to Samsung’s software expertise, but the Oukitel P1’s potential sensor size and image quality remain unknown. Given the rugged focus, both phones likely prioritize functional image capture over flagship-level photography. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither device is a primary choice for photography enthusiasts. We can assume both will have acceptable performance in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The Oukitel P1’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611 (10nm). The G99 utilizes newer Cortex-A76 and A55 cores, offering improved single-core and multi-core performance, respectively. The 6nm process node also translates to better power efficiency, contributing to the P1’s impressive battery life. While the XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611 features a higher clock speed on its A73 cores (2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz), the older architecture and larger process node mean it will likely struggle to match the G99 in sustained performance and thermal management. The G99’s architecture is better suited for modern app workloads and gaming.
Battery Life
The Oukitel P1’s 53:11h endurance is its standout feature, dwarfing what is typically expected from a phone in this price range. This is a direct result of the efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset and likely a large battery capacity (though the exact mAh is not specified). The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with its 15W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. The P1’s 18W charging, while not exceptionally fast, is sufficient to replenish the battery overnight. The P1’s 1000 charge cycle rating also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself, a crucial factor for users who rely heavily on their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel P1 if you need a phone that lasts for days on a single charge, prioritizes modern processor efficiency for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are comfortable with a less established brand. Buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro if you prefer the Samsung ecosystem, require a phone certified for specific rugged standards, and value the potential for enterprise-level support and software updates.