Oukitel P1 vs. Nokia XR20: Which Rugged Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sheer battery endurance and raw processing power for the price, the Oukitel P1 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset and impressive 53:11h endurance significantly outperform the Nokia XR20, making it ideal for extended outdoor use. However, the Nokia XR20’s 5G and wireless charging offer compelling alternatives for those needs.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel P1 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.8 g (6.60 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/56", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | $ 164.41 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 53:11h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel P1
- Exceptional battery life (53:11h endurance)
- More powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Superior CPU performance for the price
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Convenient wireless charging (15W)
- Established brand with software support
- Significantly lower battery endurance
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 480)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point of the Oukitel P1, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel, while the Nokia XR20 may feature a slightly more advanced panel. The XR20's brand positioning suggests a focus on outdoor visibility, potentially offering higher peak brightness. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the rugged design focus on durability over minimizing screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the Nokia XR20 likely emphasizes image processing and software optimization for consistent results. The Oukitel P1 may rely more on hardware specifications, potentially offering a higher megapixel count at a lower price. Both devices likely include standard features like HDR and scene detection, but the XR20’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact overall image quality.
Performance
The Oukitel P1’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) chipset represents a significant advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The G99’s newer architecture, featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, delivers superior CPU performance compared to the XR20’s Kryo 460 cores (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz). The 6nm process node further enhances efficiency, potentially leading to better thermal management during sustained workloads. While the Snapdragon 480 offers 5G connectivity, the G99 prioritizes raw processing power, making the P1 more suitable for gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel P1’s battery endurance of 53:11h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically expected from a smartphone. This is likely achieved through a combination of a large battery capacity (not specified) and the efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset. The Nokia XR20, while offering 15W wireless charging – a feature absent on the P1 – cannot compete with the P1’s longevity. Both devices share 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds, but the P1’s superior endurance minimizes the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel P1 if you need a phone that can last for days on a single charge, and you frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing without access to power outlets. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and value a more established brand with a focus on software updates and durability.