Oukitel P1 Pro vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Endurance and 5G Connectivity
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum battery life and raw processing power on a budget, the Oukitel P1 Pro is the clear winner. Its 52:55h endurance significantly outpaces the XR20, and the Helio G100 offers a performance edge. However, the Nokia XR20’s 5G and wireless charging provide added convenience for those willing to trade some battery longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel P1 Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.8 g (6.60 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | $ 239.99 / £ 199.99 / € 219.99 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:55h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel P1 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (52:55h endurance)
- Powerful Mediatek Helio G100 processor
- High charge cycle count (1200 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Nokia’s software update commitment
- Potentially more durable display glass (Victus)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less powerful processor compared to the P1 Pro
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing, but given the price points, expect 1080p+ resolution panels. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but durability. The XR20 likely benefits from Gorilla Glass Victus, a common feature in Nokia's rugged line, offering superior scratch resistance compared to the P1 Pro, which likely uses a less premium glass.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on practical usability rather than flagship-level image quality. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Nokia XR20’s image processing is likely tuned for natural colors, while Oukitel often employs more aggressive sharpening. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The Oukitel P1 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G100 (6nm) and octa-core CPU (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offer a theoretical performance advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) with its octa-core CPU (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460). The 6nm process node of the Helio G100 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load. While the Snapdragon 480 provides 5G connectivity, the G100 prioritizes CPU and GPU performance, making the P1 Pro more suitable for gaming and multitasking. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 is still efficient, but the G100 has a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Oukitel P1 Pro’s battery endurance of 52:55h is a standout feature, dwarfing the expected battery life of the Nokia XR20. While the XR20 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, the P1 Pro compensates with a longer-lasting battery and 18W wired charging. The P1 Pro also boasts 1200 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation. The XR20’s wireless charging is a convenience feature, but the P1 Pro’s sheer endurance is more impactful for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel P1 Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and you frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, value the convenience of wireless charging, and require a phone backed by Nokia’s software update commitment.