Oukitel P1 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and a more modern processor, the Oukitel P1 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Helio G100 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a performance edge and superior efficiency compared to the Cat S62 Pro's older Snapdragon 660, despite the latter's brand recognition in the rugged space.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel P1 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.8 g (6.60 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Black |
| Price | $ 239.99 / £ 199.99 / € 219.99 | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:55h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel P1 Pro
- Superior battery endurance (52:55h)
- More efficient and modern Helio G100 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potential for better image processing
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Display specifications are unknown
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in rugged phones
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 is a known quantity
- Potentially better glove-friendly touch support
- Robust build quality (expected from Cat)
- Less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Older processor architecture
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the target market, both likely feature durable, scratch-resistant panels. The Cat S62 Pro, given its brand positioning, may prioritize glove-friendly touch sensitivity. The Oukitel P1 Pro's potential for a higher refresh rate display, enabled by the more powerful chipset, would be a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming, though this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are lacking, but the chipset difference suggests the Oukitel P1 Pro has the potential for more advanced image processing capabilities. The Helio G100’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more modern, enabling features like better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the P1 Pro’s chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel P1 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G100 (6nm) boasts a newer architecture – Cortex-A76 and A55 cores – compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Helio G100 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both are octa-core CPUs with similar clock speeds (2.2 GHz peak), the G100’s architecture provides a performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 660, while still capable, is showing its age and will likely exhibit more throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oukitel P1 Pro’s 52:55h endurance is a standout feature. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 660’s less efficient 14nm process will inevitably lead to shorter battery life. The P1 Pro’s 18W charging, while not exceptionally fast, is adequate, and the inclusion of reverse wired charging adds versatility. The combination of a modern, efficient chipset and potentially larger battery capacity makes the P1 Pro the clear winner in battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel P1 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for extended outdoor use, frequent travel, or simply dislike daily charging. Its newer chipset also provides a smoother experience for multitasking and moderate gaming. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a proven track record in ruggedized devices and are comfortable with a slightly older, but still capable, processor. It's a solid choice for those needing a reliable workhorse in demanding environments.