Oukitel OT11 vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute battery life and long-term reliability, the Oukitel OT11 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 114-hour endurance rating and 1000-cycle battery promise years of service. However, the Blackview BV8800 offers a significantly faster charging experience and a more capable processor for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel OT11 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 259 x 170.6 x 8.7 mm (10.20 x 6.72 x 0.34 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 524 g (1.16 lb) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~137 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8000 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Blue | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 114:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class E (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel OT11
- Exceptional battery life (114h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower long-term running costs due to battery longevity
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Display specifications unknown
Blackview BV8800
- Faster 33W charging with reverse wired charging
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G96 processor
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (199h endurance)
- Lower battery cycle count (implied)
- Camera specifications are vague
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits and a 1348:1 contrast ratio, providing a reasonably vibrant viewing experience. While the Oukitel OT11’s display specifications are not provided, the BV8800’s contrast ratio suggests a standard IPS panel. The BV8800’s brightness is adequate for outdoor visibility, but users in direct sunlight may still experience some glare. The lack of information on the OT11’s display makes a direct comparison difficult, but the BV8800 offers a quantifiable advantage in brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Without this information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a camera is noted, but neither phone appears to be targeting photography enthusiasts. It's safe to assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but performance will likely degrade in low-light scenarios. The lack of detail suggests both cameras are likely mid-range offerings.
Performance
The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96 chipset, featuring a 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, significantly outperforms the Oukitel OT11’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The G96’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a substantial architectural improvement over the T606’s A75 cores, resulting in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. This translates to a more responsive user experience, particularly noticeable in gaming and resource-intensive applications. The T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oukitel OT11’s standout feature is its incredible 114-hour endurance rating and a claimed 1000 battery cycles. This suggests a significantly larger battery capacity than the Blackview BV8800, despite the BV8800’s 199-hour endurance. The OT11’s slow 10W charging is a trade-off for this longevity. Conversely, the Blackview BV8800 offers a much faster 33W charging solution, reaching 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. It also features reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility. The OT11 prioritizes longevity, while the BV8800 prioritizes convenience and speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel OT11 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you value long-term battery health over raw processing power. This is ideal for outdoor workers, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a phone with quicker charging, smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and don't mind charging it more frequently. This is a better choice for users who need a responsive device for everyday use and occasional gaming.