The Oukitel OKT3 and Cubot P50 represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The OKT3 prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the P50 aims for a balance of affordability and basic functionality. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for specific user needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the Oukitel OKT3 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset and impressive 95-hour battery endurance significantly outperform the Cubot P50’s Helio P22, making it ideal for travelers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone needing a reliable phone for extended periods.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, June | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 7.4 mm thickness | 156.2 x 74.6 x 9.4 mm (6.15 x 2.94 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 509 g (1.12 lb) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~215 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.51 inches, 320.3 cm2 | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1"
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.9"
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.8" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 8250 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Blue | Black, Green |
| Price | About 220 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 95:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel OKT3
- Exceptional 95-hour battery endurance
- More modern and efficient Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Advertised 1000 charge cycles for long-term battery health
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially limiting visual experience
- Camera details are lacking, suggesting average image quality
Cubot P50
- Lower price point (likely)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Compact and lightweight (potentially)
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Outdated MediaTek Helio P22 chipset
- Significantly lower battery life compared to the OKT3
- Limited performance for multitasking and gaming
- Likely lower build quality and materials
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here is on processing power, as display quality is often a secondary consideration in this segment. Expect 720p+ resolutions at best on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. The absence of information suggests neither device will excel in photography. The focus is likely on providing functional cameras for casual snapshots rather than high-quality images. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the small sensor size and limited image quality.
Performance
The Oukitel OKT3’s Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset represents a significant architectural advantage over the Cubot P50’s MediaTek Helio P22. The T616 utilizes a combination of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, offering a more modern and efficient design. The A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz) provide a noticeable boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking, compared to the P50’s all-Cortex-A53 cores (8x2.0 GHz). While the P50 has more cores, the older A53 architecture is less efficient and delivers lower performance per clock cycle. This translates to a more sluggish experience on the P50, especially when handling demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oukitel OKT3’s 95-hour endurance is its standout feature. This is a substantial advantage over what the Cubot P50 likely offers. The T616’s 12nm process contributes to this efficiency. Furthermore, the OKT3’s advertised 1000 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, indicating a higher-quality battery cell. The OKT3 also features reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, which the P50 lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel OKT3 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you anticipate moderate multitasking or light gaming. Its architecture is geared towards efficiency. Buy the Cubot P50 if you prioritize the absolute lowest price point and only require basic smartphone functionality like calls, texts, and occasional social media browsing. It's a functional device for minimal users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Oukitel OKT3 capable of playing modern mobile games?
The Unisoc Tiger T616 can handle many popular mobile games, but expect to play at lower settings (medium or low) to maintain a stable frame rate. It’s not a gaming powerhouse, but it’s significantly more capable than the Helio P22 in the Cubot P50.
❓ How does the 1000 charge cycle claim on the Oukitel OKT3 affect the battery's lifespan?
The 1000 charge cycle claim suggests the battery used in the Oukitel OKT3 is designed to retain a higher percentage of its original capacity after being charged and discharged 1000 times, compared to batteries with fewer cycles. This translates to a longer usable lifespan before noticeable degradation.
❓ Will the Cubot P50 struggle with common apps like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Chrome?
The Cubot P50’s Helio P22 chipset may exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns when running multiple apps simultaneously, including Facebook, WhatsApp, and Chrome. It’s best suited for running one app at a time to avoid performance issues.
❓ Does the Oukitel OKT3 support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
While the context data doesn't specify charging wattage, the focus on endurance suggests a slower, more conservative charging approach to preserve battery health. A full charge likely takes several hours, but the extended battery life minimizes the need for frequent charging.
