Oukitel C69 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: A Deep Dive into Rugged Phone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and fast charging, the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset and 66W charging significantly outperform the Oukitel C69’s Unisoc T615 and 18W charging, despite the C69’s respectable battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C69 | Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83 x 9.5 mm (6.94 x 3.27 x 0.37 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 243 g (8.57 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 64 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2", AF | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) 5 MP, f/2.2, (FLIR thermal camera, Lepton module) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Purple, Green, Black | Black |
| Price | $ 116.43 / £ 109.99 / € 129.99 | About 700 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | 88:30h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class C |
Oukitel C69
- Excellent battery endurance (65:08h)
- Long-term battery health (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Slower processor (Unisoc T615)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
- Superior performance (Mediatek Dimensity 7050)
- Ultra-fast charging (66W)
- Wireless charging (15W & 5W reverse)
- Higher price
- Slightly lower battery endurance (88:30h)
- Potentially more complex software
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature LCD panels given their price points and rugged focus. The Ulefone 18T Ultra’s chipset suggests potential for a higher refresh rate display, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, prioritizing screen protection over a modern, edge-to-edge aesthetic. Color accuracy will likely be secondary to durability and visibility in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra, positioned as a higher-tier device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Oukitel C69 will likely rely on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Ulefone would be a significant advantage in low-light conditions, reducing blur and improving image clarity. We anticipate both phones will include a 2MP macro camera, which typically offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050, built on a 6nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Oukitel C69’s Unisoc T615 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.6 GHz) offer significantly higher single-core performance than the C69’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x1.8 GHz), translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 6nm node also provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged use. The Ulefone’s likely LPDDR5 RAM further enhances responsiveness compared to the C69’s unspecified RAM type.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra boasts an impressive 88:30h endurance, exceeding the Oukitel C69’s 65:08h. While the C69’s 1000 charge cycles indicate long-term battery health, the 18T Ultra’s advantage is amplified by its 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 52% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The addition of 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging on the Ulefone provides further convenience, features absent on the Oukitel C69.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C69 if you need a dependable, long-lasting phone for basic tasks and prioritize maximizing battery uptime over raw processing power. It’s ideal for infrequent users or those working in areas with limited charging access. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra if you demand a responsive experience for demanding apps, gaming, or frequent multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging and wireless charging capabilities.