Oukitel WP210 vs. C69: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Oukitel WP210 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, if maximizing battery life is paramount, the Oukitel C69’s impressive 65:08h endurance makes it the superior choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oukitel C69 | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83 x 9.5 mm (6.94 x 3.27 x 0.37 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 243 g (8.57 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 64 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2", AF | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Purple, Green, Black | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | $ 116.43 / £ 109.99 / € 129.99 | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 65:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class C |
Oukitel C69
- Exceptional battery life (65:08h endurance)
- Affordable price point
- 1000 charge cycles for longevity
- Unisoc T615 chipset limits performance
- Slower 18W charging
Oukitel WP210
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Fast 45W wired charging
- Superior performance for gaming and multitasking
- Likely shorter battery life compared to C69
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP210’s focus on performance, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the C69, contributing to a smoother visual experience. The C69, prioritizing battery, may utilize a more power-efficient panel. Bezels are likely similar given both phones target the budget segment. Color accuracy is also unknown, but likely standard for this price point.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is difficult. However, the WP210’s higher processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 8200 chipset is a key advantage. We can assume both phones will include a standard set of lenses, but the WP210 is likely to offer a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is significant. The Oukitel WP210’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset, boasting a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 3.1 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores at 3.0 GHz and four efficiency cores. This contrasts sharply with the Oukitel C69’s Unisoc T615 (12nm), which utilizes a dual-core Cortex-A75 setup at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 translates to superior power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load, making the WP210 ideal for gaming and demanding tasks. The C69’s T615 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Oukitel C69 shines, offering an impressive 65:08h of endurance. While the WP210’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 86:17h endurance suggests a larger battery *and* optimized power management despite the more powerful processor. The WP210 compensates for potential battery drain with 45W wired charging, significantly faster than the C69’s 18W charging. This means the WP210 can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. The C69’s slower charging speed will require a longer connection to the wall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C69 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases involve basic communication, light social media, and media consumption. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and are willing to charge your phone more frequently.