Oukitel has carved a niche for itself with durable, feature-packed phones at competitive prices. The C69 and WP19 represent two distinct approaches: the C69 prioritizes extended battery life and efficiency, while the WP19 aims for a more robust performance profile. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two models, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and cost-effectiveness, the Oukitel C69 is the better choice. Its exceptional 65:08h battery endurance and 1000 charge cycles outweigh the WP19’s performance advantage. However, users demanding more responsive gaming and app loading will find the WP19’s Helio G95 a worthwhile upgrade.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2022, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2022, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83 x 9.5 mm (6.94 x 3.27 x 0.37 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 243 g (8.57 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 64 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2", AF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 21000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Purple, Green, Black | Blue, Camo, Camouflage |
| Price | $ 116.43 / £ 109.99 / € 129.99 | About 380 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 65:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oukitel C69
- Exceptional battery life (65:08h endurance)
- Impressive 1000 charge cycles for long-term reliability
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Oukitel WP19
- Faster and more responsive performance with Helio G95
- Faster charging (33W) reduces downtime
- Better suited for gaming and multitasking
- Shorter battery life compared to the C69
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither Oukitel provides display specifications beyond size, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here is on the internal hardware driving the experience. The C69’s Unisoc T615 will have less graphical horsepower to push higher resolutions or refresh rates, making it likely suited for 720p or 1080p displays. The WP19, with its Helio G95, is better equipped for a smoother experience at 1080p, potentially even supporting higher refresh rates if Oukitel chose to implement them.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oukitel typically focuses on megapixel count rather than sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) in this price bracket. It’s safe to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially macro/depth sensors. The WP19’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio G95 chipset *could* lead to slightly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions, but this is heavily dependent on software optimization. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found on these devices are unlikely to provide significant detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oukitel WP19’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a significant step up from the C69’s Unisoc T615 (12nm). The G95 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the C69’s 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores – resulting in noticeably faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The G95’s Mali-G76 MC4 GPU also provides a substantial boost in graphics performance, making it the better choice for gaming. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the G95 translate to a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Oukitel C69 boasts an impressive 65:08h endurance rating and a remarkable 1000 charge cycles, indicating a focus on long-term battery health. This is a major advantage for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency. The WP19, while likely having a respectable battery capacity, doesn’t match the C69’s endurance. However, it compensates with 33W wired charging, significantly faster than the C69’s 18W charging. This means the WP19 can replenish its battery much quicker, reducing downtime, even if it doesn’t last as long on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oukitel C69 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use cases involve everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Oukitel WP19 if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value faster charging speeds, even at the expense of some battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T615 in the Oukitel C69 struggle with modern mobile games?
Yes, the Unisoc T615 is an entry-level chipset. While it can handle less demanding games, you'll likely experience noticeable lag and reduced frame rates in graphically intensive titles. Lowering graphics settings is recommended, but even then, performance may be limited.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Oukitel WP19 with the 33W charger?
While Oukitel doesn't provide exact 0-100% charging times, 33W charging typically takes around 1.5 to 2 hours for a similarly sized battery. This is significantly faster than the C69’s 18W charging, which could take upwards of 3 hours.
❓ Is the 1000 charge cycle claim for the Oukitel C69 realistic?
While 1000 cycles is a high number, Oukitel’s claim is plausible given the C69’s focus on battery health and the Unisoc T615’s efficiency. However, the actual battery capacity degradation after 1000 cycles will still occur, but it should be slower than with phones using less optimized charging and power management.
❓ Will the Oukitel WP19 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is known to generate more heat than the Unisoc T615. While Oukitel likely implements thermal management solutions, prolonged gaming at high settings *could* lead to some throttling to prevent overheating. The WP19’s rugged design may also help dissipate heat.
